Old Lanky
What a shambles this site is
Only back two or three days and it is already clear as day that the site has not improved one bit. If anything, it is much worse because it is evident that many good editors whom I encountered in 2013 have long since moved out. The dross, however, remains and there is much more of it.
"Anyone can edit" sounds reasonable. A good soundbite. Until you realise that what it entails is "any idiot can edit". And they do. There is a whole army of them.
The big problem on here is what the site politely calls "original research". I see it in numerous articles. Someone has read something and tried to write hi own account of what he has read without double-checking his facts. As a result, serious errors get into the article and, because the verifiabily rule is so relaxed, it stays there "pending a citation". Never mind pending, it is unverified so get rid. Immediately.
A knowledgeable editor comes along who decides that he will highlight the problems and remove rubbish. What happens? Some schoolkid who knows everything and understands nothing reinstates it all.
As I say, the site is a shambles. I have better things to do. Old Lanky (talk) 15:20, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
- Please don't give up on us all. I see from the history of your user page that you wrote/developed the articles on Ansdell, Lytham, St. Anne's, and Squire's Gate stations! Thank you!! There are a lot of us who just want to work on articles. Please reconsider. Yngvadottir (talk) 17:39, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Old Lanky. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)