Your addition to Robin and the 7 Hoods (Rat Pack soundtrack album) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. ttonyb (talk) 23:22, 15 March 2010 (UTC)Reply


Your addition to My Way: The Best of Frank Sinatra has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. ttonyb (talk) 23:25, 15 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Frank Sinatra: 10 CD Box Set edit

 

A tag has been placed on Frank Sinatra: 10 CD Box Set requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. De728631 (talk) 22:04, 22 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for yelling at you with the final warning notice, you're actually doing a lot of work at the Sinatra pages. However, I am still convinced that the 10 CD box is not noteworthy enough to be included in Wikipedia. I have nominated the article for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Sinatra: 10 CD Box Set, where everybody can discuss it. De728631 (talk) 18:10, 23 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of 16 Most Requested Songs edit

 

The article 16 Most Requested Songs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable compilation, article reads like an advert, rating reference is wrong.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. De728631 (talk) 14:38, 27 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

I really do think that we do NOT need to include every available compilation whatsoever in Wikipedia. Per WP:notability (music), "All articles on albums, singles or songs must meet the basic criteria at the notability guidelines, with significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". So far you have only provided false Allmusic links for reviews of other albums in this article and the one I criticised above. Please do not create any more "album" stubs for Sinatra unless the publication is really noteworthy and has received sufficient secondary coverage! De728631 (talk) 14:42, 27 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of 16 Most Requested Songs edit

An editor has nominated 16 Most Requested Songs, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/16 Most Requested Songs and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. De728631 (talk) 15:36, 28 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

April 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with 16 Most Requested Songs. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 16:17, 1 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Your addition to 16 Most Requested Songs has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Copied from http://www.amazon.com/Most-Requested-Songs-Frank-Sinatra/dp/B00000288H Whpq (talk) 16:20, 1 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Your addition to The Very Best of Frank Sinatra has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Copied from http://www.amazon.com/Very-Best-Frank-Sinatra/dp/B000002NFI Whpq (talk) 16:23, 1 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Your addition to Everything Happens to Me (Frank Sinatra album) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Copied from http://www.amazon.com/review/R2PG8RO84SQIWT/ref=cm_cr_rdp_perm Whpq (talk) 16:29, 1 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Your addition to A Voice in Time: 1939-1952 has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Copied from http://www.amazon.com/review/R2LIQD2U94JM1K/ref=cm_cr_rdp_perm Whpq (talk) 16:39, 1 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Your addition to Frank Sinatra Christmas Collection has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Copied from http://www.amazon.com/Frank-Sinatra-Christmas-Collection/product-reviews/B00063MC66 Whpq (talk) 16:43, 1 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of The Hungry Years (Frank Sinatra album) edit

 

The article The Hungry Years (Frank Sinatra album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced. Nothing in WP:reliable sources that I can find on google.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 17:59, 21 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Frank Sinatra Bootlegs edit

 

The article Frank Sinatra Bootlegs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced. Nothing on google that provide WP:reliable sources. No indication of significance.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 18:05, 21 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Please read http://sinatraguide.com/ for a better overview of his album chronology. Thanks. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 21:44, 6 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Sinatra! edit

Please reply on my talk page. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 21:51, 13 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

June 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Erpert (let's talk about it) 16:38, 9 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page The Platinum Collection (Frank Sinatra album) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. MC10 (TCGBL) 04:05, 12 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Look, I'm sorry. I was trying to help.

Speedy deletion nomination of Sinatra Saga Vol.2 edit

 

A tag has been placed on Sinatra Saga Vol.2 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 06:34, 24 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Frank Sinatra: Live at Melbourne Festival Hall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

More templates than text. Does not even appear to be a live album, but rather just a concert. No evidence of notability or significance.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 14:32, 21 December 2022 (UTC)Reply