Orphaned non-free image (File:OTBlogo.jpg)

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:OTBlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 07:27, 22 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:Out of the Box Publishing Logo.jpeg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Out of the Box Publishing Logo.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:24, 24 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Out of the Box Publishing page

edit

Greetings. I enjoy your games, and I'd like to help improve the Out of the Box Publishing Wikipedia page. One of the things the article needs most is third-party sources about the company and it's games. Of course the official webpage has plenty of info, but that's info from the company itself, and Wikipedia needs information from outside sources. I can find a lot of online blogs that review the games (e.g. [1], [2], or [3]), but these aren't really notable reviewers. Do you have a press packet or something? Have the games been reviewed in major publications (e.g. Games Magazine), or has the company been mentioned in a Wisconsin newspaper? These sources would really help expand and support the article. All the best, – Quadell (talk) 15:34, 24 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello and thank you! Im new to Wikipedia and so Im not even sure if this is the best way to respond. In any case, I do have many third party sources. Below are several, but I could certainly send more if needed. [4], [5], [6], [7], [8] Thanks again, Leah

These are just what I was looking for. I'll see what I can do. (Also, I have replied to your question at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions#How to classify promotional images from one.27s own company.) – Quadell (talk) 17:23, 24 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thank you so much! I really appreciate the help. I am talking to my internal team about the image copyright stuff and should have a letter over soon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.255.19.156 (talk) 15:21, 25 October 2013 (UTC)Reply