User talk:OctopusSuction/sandbox

Peer Review

I think you have done a really good job on editing your article. I think that the addition of the sections on the KOFST and defense technology are needed and I think the placement of booth in the article are good. I liked that you added to the Aerospace Engineering section. I think it was a good idea to add information on the companies involved in the aerospace and defense market. The only suggestion here would be to include information on Naro-2. Since it was planed to be developed by 2018 I was wondering what had happened there. Did they follow through? If they did was it successful? I think you have good information in the defense technology section. However, I was wondering if there was any information on the amount or percentage of the expected increase for their spending for 2019? If you have found any information on the projection that might be good to include. I wasn't sure if you were planning on making any changes to the Biotechnology section, but I was interested to see if there were any more cases of cloning, since the most recent case listed on the wiki article was from 2007. If you are going to do more I think this would be a good place to add more information. Such as any recent cases of cloning, if there has been a decline, increase, or steady progression in research and developments in genetics and cloning. Or more information on ethics regulations in the industry.

I think you have done a good job of flushing this article out more and adding relevant and pertinent information. Good job! Ckamikawa (talk) 05:14, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

@Ckamikawa: Thank you very much for the feedback. I will look for more information on the Naro-2 to see if there are any substantial updates to include. I will also see if I can find amounts or percentages of spending increases.

Yeah, that's a good idea about possibly adding more information to the biotechnology section.

Thank you so much for the helpful feedback!! OctopusSuction (talk) 21:43, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Feedback on possible topics

This list looks great, and I like that you've identified specific content gaps you might address. See where the research takes you, and you can make the final decision based on what kind of sources you find. Ctextor at uofu (talk) 12:27, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

@Ctextor at uofu: Great, thanks for the feedback! I am wondering, should all changes I make be reflected on my "view history" tab? I edited a sentence on Kakao Games, but I can't seem to see that reflected on my "view history" page. The change that I made was definitely published and still exists on the Wikipedia article (as of 9/26). OctopusSuction (talk) 23:59, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Wait, I think I have figured out part of the issue. I was only looking at the view history for my user page. However, I am still interested, is there a place where I can see all of my edits being recorded (no matter where they take place)? OctopusSuction (talk) 00:02, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

@OctopusSuction: Try this link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/OctopusSuction Ctextor at uofu (talk) 14:49, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

@Ctextor at uofu: Thank you!! OctopusSuction (talk) 17:05, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Possible Topics

• Kakao Games
  • Due to the lack of information in this Wikipedia article, I think that it would be a good option to try to add to. There isn't a lot of information beyond about a paragraph of basic background, therefore I think that I would be able to find meaningful things to add. Such as going into greater detail about the history, explaining about the games that are published, and adding some images that represent the topics.
• Cinema of Korea
  • This article is also lacking in information and even has empty sections prompting users to help by adding to it. I think that there would be a lot of interesting and relevant information to be added to this Wikipedia article. Such as filling in some more information in the empty sections and also including information about the cinema of Korea in the modern day (because that seems to be lacking in this article).
• Science and technology of South Korea
  • Once again, this article seems to be lacking in information. There are three small subsections, but there is not an introduction which has an overview of what the article is about. Furthermore, it seems that there should be a lot more relevant information that could be added to this article beyond three small subsections. I think that it would be meaningful if I added an introduction section that informs the reader about the article and I also think there is more relevant information that could be added to this article.

Citation Practice

Diogenes heteropsammicola are found in Japan. Specifically, these crustaceans are found in shallow waters.