Speedy deletion nomination of Tuscarora Intermediate Unit edit

 

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Tuscarora Intermediate Unit, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Tuscarora Intermediate Unit and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  Blanchardb -MeMyEarsMyMouth- timed 15:34, 31 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

July 2010 edit

  Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Tuscarora Intermediate Unit. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 16:14, 31 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Tuscarora Intermediate Unit. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 16:29, 31 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Why Tuscarora Intermediate Unit 11 is deleted??????????? edit

Tuscarora Intermediate Unit is non profit educational service agency. It services school districts of Pennsylvania. There is no intention for advertising this. If you feel this as an advertisement, please visit tiu11.org or read more about intermediate units in Pennsylvania. Could you please revert your changes back?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuscarora_Intermediate_Unit —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nsriramkumar (talkcontribs) 16:28, 31 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

The article is currently only marked for administrative attention trough the usage of a speedy deletion template, which was added by User:Blanchardb. Such template's should not be removed by the creator of the page - instead you should state the reason why the page should be kept on the Article's talk page (And i see you already did that). An administrator will evaluate the article and determine if it should be kept or removed, taking into account the reason you provided.
Seeing the article's current state i would equally give you a few pointers. In order to be on Wikipedia, an article's subject has to meet a certain notability threshold. In other words a company or agency must have some sort of "importance" to be included on Wikipedia, which is done trough the inclusion of reliable, third party sources that are independent of the subject. Technically taken, all the content in an article should be sourced with such references.
Second, i would advice to do a strong pass over the article checking for World to watch and Promotional language. Sentences such as "The Intermediate Unit board, administration and staff are proud of the services they provide, and they welcome inquiries from the community and recipients of services." could be deemed promotional as they have an inherent judgment in them, rather then providing truly objective information. I hope this helps, Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 16:57, 31 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problem: Tuscarora Intermediate Unit edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Tuscarora Intermediate Unit, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from https://www.tiu11.org/index.php?Itemid=118&id=20&option=com_content&task=view, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Tuscarora Intermediate Unit saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Cameron Scott (talk) 17:04, 31 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Sri Koil Kanthadai Sudhasatvam Sirupuliyur Koil Annan Swamy Thirumaligai edit

Hello Nsriramkumar,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sri Koil Kanthadai Sudhasatvam Sirupuliyur Koil Annan Swamy Thirumaligai for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Anastasia Bykova (talk) 03:28, 29 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problems with Sri Koil Kanthadai Sudhasatvam Sirupuliyur Koil Annan Swamy Thirumaligai edit

 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Sri Koil Kanthadai Sudhasatvam Sirupuliyur Koil Annan Swamy Thirumaligai, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.srissannanswamy.org/new/. As a copyright violation, Sri Koil Kanthadai Sudhasatvam Sirupuliyur Koil Annan Swamy Thirumaligai appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Sri Koil Kanthadai Sudhasatvam Sirupuliyur Koil Annan Swamy Thirumaligai has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 10:39, 29 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Advice edit

You must not copy material into Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia will not host copyright material, not even in sandboxes or AfC submission pages, not even temporarily. Please read Wikipedia:Copy-paste.

Please note that assertion of permission to use text is not enough; we have to be certain that the person giving a release has the authority to do so, and that the actual copyright holder understands and agrees to Wikipedia's license terms, which allow any reader to copy, modify and re-use material for any purpose including commercial. For those reasons, a formal copyright release, as described above, is required.

It is very seldom worth making a copyright release, because the promotional tone of a company or personal website is likely to be quite unsuitable for an encyclopedia article, which requires a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not a notice-board for pinning up copies of promotional material.

Article subjects need to have notability, which is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." There is good advice on how to write an acceptable article at WP:Your first article.

Regards, JohnCD (talk) 10:43, 29 December 2012 (UTC)Reply