Sanjjanaa

edit

Hi there, in this edit, why did you remove the content about the subject's critical response? Please don't remove content without providing a clear explanation. Your apparently confused editing left behind an opinion presented as a fact. "Sanjjanaa has made a decent debut and she is extremely daring and does justice to her role" This is not acceptable. I've restored the previous version. If you wish to remove the content again, you will need to achieve consensus to do so by opening a discussion on the article's talk page and providing a compelling argument

Additionally, here you added unsourced content about awards she's won. We're only interested in notable awards, i.e. ones that have articles already written about them, not small-town regional awards or whatever. This content has been removed. And here you added the subject's birth date without providing a reference. You cannot do that. Publishing a person's birth date without it first being widely published could constitute a privacy violation. That's what the super-obvious warning text was there for--to warn inexperienced people such as yourself to not add unsourced information. Please don't do this again. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:03, 27 July 2018 (UTC)Reply