NoblePacificist
December 2015
edit
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Gun violence in the United States has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Gun violence in the United States was changed by NoblePacificist (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.88989 on 2015-12-07T20:27:58+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:28, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
 | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. -- GB fan 20:49, 7 December 2015 (UTC) |
NoblePacificist (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I don't understand why I was blocked. All I did was add helpful information to an article. Please explain your actions. Is there some sort of Wikipedia Cabal conspiracy to ensure that no negative information about the effects of guns can be posted? I am a new user who came on here to check Wikipedia's information on gun violence, and found it stuffed full of half-truths, outright lies, and self-deluding bromides. Why is a new user being banned merely for adding some neutral information about the violent effects of guns, which was well-sourced? This is a Stalinist, Totalitarian policy you are engaging in, suppressing the right to free speech, when backed by well-cited references. Please consider your actions, and realize that blood may be on your hands if you continue to suppress free speech about guns, backed with references. No one has a right to interrupt the free flow of true information. Unblock me and let us join ranks in letting the blinding light of knowledge shine upon this dark cave. I am a new user to your encylopedia project. NoblePacificist (talk) 20:54, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You should probably go back to working on your scholarly article. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:19, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.