Welcome!

Hello, NoNameR, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

Journalist C./ Holla @ me!

Welcome 2

edit

You can try out formatting pages at the Wikipedia:Sandpit. Don't worry about breaking the lists at Bonzo Dog Band, I'll put them back together again. --bodnotbod 19:15, 26 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Bonzos

edit

Hello. I've replied on Talk:Bonzo Dog Band (moving your comment to the bottom of the page as most recent comments always get added to the bottom here at Wikipedia). As you say, it boils down to us having different aesthetic tastes. Perhaps if we wait a few days others will join the debate and maybe we can reach a consensus. --bodnotbod 00:50, 27 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion warning

edit

A tag has been placed on Billy Ruffian (band), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person, group of people, or band, but it does not indicate how or why he/she/they is/are notable. If you can indicate why Billy Ruffian (band) is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Billy Ruffian (band). Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. You might also want to read our general biography criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert his/her/their notability, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable. MER-C 12:04, 10 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for Image:Whos.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Whos.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:11, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Norgar.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading Image:Norgar.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:43, 24 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih (talk) 03:43, 24 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Michael Donohoe (athlete)

edit
 

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Michael Donohoe (athlete), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 12:44, 2 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Phelps Gold Medals

edit

CHEW ON THIS PHELPS NOW HAS 12 GOLD MEDALS. Do you have any proof to back up your claim for this guy from Rhodes? IE a source.--Subman758 (talk) 17:00, 15 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of List of burial places of UK Prime Ministers

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of burial places of UK Prime Ministers, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Road Wizard (talk) 21:26, 13 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

A.W. Kiddie

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of A.W. Kiddie, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.richardgardnerantiques.co.uk/pages/large/large1659.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:17, 5 December 2008 (UTC)Reply