January 2012

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to FC Steaua București, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Liban Abdi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Liban Abdi was changed by Nico17 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.87128 on 2012-01-14T04:21:24+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:21, 14 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ştefan Radu, you may be blocked from editing. Eddie Nixon (talk) 16:46, 15 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Arpad Paskany

edit

Hello, Nico17, and thank you for your contributions!

I wanted to let you know it seems an article you worked on, Arpad Paskany, is copied from another Wikipedia page, Árpád Pászkány. It's fine to do this as long as you provide the following information in the edit summary:

  1. a link to the article you copied from
  2. the date you copied it

You can do this now by editing the page, making any minor edit to the article, and adding the above information into the edit summary.

If you're still not sure how to fix the problem, please leave a message at the help desk. It's possible that I made a mistake, so feel free to remove the tag I placed on the article.

Thanks again for helping build the free encyclopedia! CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:37, 15 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Arpad Paskany

edit
 

The article Arpad Paskany has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sparthorse (talk) 13:57, 15 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Arpad Paskany. Thank you. Sparthorse (talk) 13:59, 15 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of ECOMAX General Investments

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on ECOMAX General Investments requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sparthorse (talk) 13:59, 15 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Árpád Pászkány

edit
 

The article Árpád Pászkány has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sparthorse (talk) 14:04, 15 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

January 2012, continued

edit

  This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Stefan Radu, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Denisarona (talk) 16:50, 15 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent disruptive editing, including repeatedly removing content from articles with no explanation. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:49, 15 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Simão Mate Junior, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Denniss (talk) 21:02, 24 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

February 2012

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Taye Taiwo, you may be blocked from editing. --Oleola (talk) 14:50, 8 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Taye Taiwo, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Oleola (talk) 15:59, 8 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

March 2012

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at David Abraham (footballer). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. GiantSnowman 14:48, 10 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Valentin Lemnaru, you may be blocked from editing. GiantSnowman 19:13, 11 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Ianis Zicu, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Oleola (talk) 12:08, 18 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

April 2012

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sebastian Larsson, you may be blocked from editing. Struway2 (talk) 08:00, 4 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

May 2012

edit

  This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as seen in Eric Pereira, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Oleola (talk) 19:56, 11 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

July 2012

edit

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kyle Bartley, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. GiantSnowman 08:29, 18 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Rafael Rocha, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Oleola (talk) 00:32, 24 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

August 2012

edit

  Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Ashley Cole, because it didn't appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Mattythewhite (talk) 21:50, 3 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply