Re: Mukasey

edit

Mukasey has not yet been nominated by President Bush to be AG. Please stop changing the article to say so. At this point it is just rumors. — Steven Andrew Miller (talk) 22:17, 16 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

You are WRONG. http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/politics/5139487.html


No, you are wrong. That is a rumor. "According to a source" wait until there is an official announcement. Last week Olson was supposed to be nominated. — Steven Andrew Miller (talk) 22:23, 16 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

No, you are wrong. It's NOW been cited by CNN and Washington Post. Look it up yourself.

Warning

edit

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. WaltonOne 16:54, 17 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Note: You may or may not be aware of the three-revert rule, as you're not a regular user. However, you were reported to the administrators' noticeboard for edit-warring, as you have already made more than 3 reverts in 24 hours. Please do not keep reverting other people's edits, else you may be blocked. WaltonOne 16:54, 17 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

March 2010

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Recess appointment, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Falcon8765 (talk) 03:27, 28 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of TJ Lubinsky

edit
 

The article TJ Lubinsky has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unref, promotional BLP that would need TNT'ing even if notable. I couldn't find sources though to show he meets WP:N.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 07:22, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply