Welcome! edit

Hello, Naomil07, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Brianda and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Additional Resources
  • You can find answers to many student questions in our FAQ.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 00:47, 2 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

You have an overdue training assignment. edit

Please complete the assigned training modules. --Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:59, 15 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Peer Review edit

Overall, I think your article is well-developed and clear. You are adding important content to the existing article, and I think your paragraphs will really help strengthen the existing sections. You also do a great job integrating statistics in the public opinion section. I appreciate that you don’t just summarize some of these studies, but actually share the percentage increases and explain why that might have occurred. Like I mentioned in the comments, the mention of modern sexism and how that has impacted the “war on women” rhetoric is very interesting and something I’ve never thought about. I do think that there is room to draw a stronger connection to the war on women topic in the second half of that paragraph. Because a neo-sexism wiki article already exists, I think you could spend more time focusing on how modern sexism relates to the war on women than its impact on voting behavior. Additionally, looking at the original article, I think there’s also an opportunity to add more to the political campaigns section. I think the “war on women” rhetoric has been used a lot outside of just presidential campaign, especially after and surrounding the Dobbs decision. I think this would also allow you to bring in a diverse set of sources! Gpol643 (talk) 20:54, 31 March 2023 (UTC) 128.252.48.38 (talk) 19:00, 12 April 2023 (UTC)Reply