Thanks for noticing Rivenburg's violation of his block on the Michel Thomas article and pointing it out. I will do what I can to ensure he does not violate the block in future. Sometimes naughty boys require a little discipline! 166.205.139.18 (talk) 03:04, 13 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Talk:Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting edit

You've made two requests on this talk page, both of which asking for "Republican" to be added to something or other. It's not going to happen for various reasons, one of them being that it has the distinct flavor of pushing a particular point of view. Please refrain--thank you. Drmies (talk) 19:20, 18 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:Michel Thomas at Silver Star Ceremony, WWII Memorial Washington, DC 2004.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Michel Thomas at Silver Star Ceremony, WWII Memorial Washington, DC 2004.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (tc) 23:52, 3 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

FYI edit

On Michel Thomas, two things: yes, admins do not "approve" content, though they may disapprove content, so to speak, like BLP violations. However, your citation is to a primary source; it needs a secondary source. It REALLY needs a secondary source. I am not going to revert it for that reason, since the information is interesting enough--WAIT, it is actually a secondary source, it's just not properly cited. Please see WP:CITE and use the right template (Template:cite journal, maybe). If the IP reverts again, I will block and semi-protect. Drmies (talk) 00:12, 29 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Michel Thomas law case edit

You deleted my summary saying "‎Defamation lawsuit, Silver Star: The court made no such determination." Au contraire! I feel the summary I wrote was a fair representation of the court's decision. Please advise why you think otherwise. Arrivisto (talk) 10:18, 11 July 2023 (UTC)Reply