Hilliards, Pennsylvania

edit

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Hilliards, Pennsylvania, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 68.239.79.97 06:39, 1 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Boyers, Pennsylvania

edit

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Boyers, Pennsylvania, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 68.239.79.97 06:44, 1 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Duplicate images uploaded

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Breakneck Creek.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:IMG 2187.JPG. The copy called Image:IMG 2187.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 04:45, 23 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Duplicate images uploaded

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Breakneck.JPG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Breakneck creek.JPG. The copy called Image:Breakneck creek.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 04:31, 30 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Geneva College picture

edit

Nice picture of Macartney Library! Is there any way that you could instead move it to the Wikimedia Commons? Nyttend 13:35, 15 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of List of people from Butler, Pennsylvania

edit
 

A tag has been placed on List of people from Butler, Pennsylvania, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD A1.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 04:39, 10 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Rock Airport

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Rock Airport requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wtfdontkill (talk) 01:56, 6 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

McCartney Library

edit

I take it you're planning to write an article on the library; I'll check here at home to see what, if anything, we have that could be a good source for it, as well as Old Main. Nyttend (talk) 16:25, 7 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

By the way, please don't remove mapit links and similar templates: they're helpful, and the guidelines want them. Nyttend (talk) 16:27, 7 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Planet Stadium

edit
 

An editor has nominated Planet Stadium, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Planet Stadium and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 14:20, 20 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

New article idea

edit

You like to create articles on buildings and structures. Have you considered the church on Pitcairn Island? There's somewhat online about it (you could likely find some things in print as well), and it's likely notable for being the only church in the "country". Nyttend (talk) 04:06, 22 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Mars

edit

Thanks for adding a new pic to the Mars. There is one problem. The new pic you added isn't showing up. I tried tweaking the image name but this didn't work either. I restored the page until the new image is fixed. Thanks again and if you need help with it, I can probably help. Dincher (talk) 18:16, 27 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

The new pic looks good! Dincher (talk) 18:32, 27 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Rail Infoboxes

edit

Hello -- It's nice to see that someone else is interested in Pittsburgh area trolleys and interurbans, where Wikipedia coverage still seems a bit sparse. Just a reminder that there are several different rail infoboxes, depending on the gauge of the rails. For Pittsburgh, Harmony, Butler and New Castle Railway, I see that you used the standard gauge infobox. However, most (not all) of the Pennsylvania trolleys and interurbans used the 5 ft 2-1/2 inch gauge, sometimes referred to as "Pennsylvania Trolley Gauge." This was typically demanded by municipal governments when authorizing the laying of trolley/interurban track, to ensure that noisy steam locomotives could never operate on town streets.

There is a version of the rail infobox suitable for non-standard gauges (for example, see West Penn Railways), in which the user needs to insert the gauge. Canadian2006 (talk) 02:19, 13 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

NRHP

edit

After losing my camera for over a month, I finally got it back the other day, and yesterday cycled around Pittsburgh taking pictures of NRHP sites, most of which don't have any articles. Do you create NRHP articles about places that you've never seen? Nyttend (talk) 22:19, 13 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi Mvincec, You asked at my userpage if i would create NRHP tables for all the counties in Pennsylvania, noting i had table-ized Allegheny County. I notice User:dtbohrer (sp?) created some already, also, by the way. There is some skill/"expertise" involved in doing these right, although I do use a county-table-generator tool to do the heavy work upfront. Sure, I could plug away at PA now, and have just started with Adams County, within List of RHPs in PA. It will take some time though. Let me know which counties you'd like me to get to sooner rather than later.
Me, i create stub articles about lots of NRHPs, when i have a source to use, more often than when i have a pic to add. There are other wp:NRHPers who will only create an article if they have a pic ready to add. I have most recently finished "table-izing" the List of RHPs in NY. Cheers, doncram (talk) 10:54, 19 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Pullman Park

edit

Nice new picture. I had been meaning to get down there and take a new one sometime, but never got to it. Hopefully we can get a few from inside eventually. Blackngold29 18:08, 9 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

College Hill (Beaver Falls)

edit

Hi there.

Some editors are debating nominating your article on College Hill for deletion. I'd add some sources to it if you can. –Bdb484 (talk) 03:34, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

I think you knew that I expanded the article somewhat; but just to let you know, I've improved it a bit more this morning. Nyttend (talk) 16:51, 24 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Dog Jack

edit

Hi there, Thanks for adding the Dog Jack page. Just wondering how you heard about it. Please e-mail me from my talk page. Thanks. Soccerman7 (talk) 07:59, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I got your message. I worked on the film. We just recorded the narration with Louis Gossett Jr. Please e-mail me from my page and I can share more.Soccerman7 (talk) 23:15, 16 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Carnegie Library of Beaver Falls

edit

I've deleted your photo of the library here in Beaver Falls — because I've moved it to Commons. Its new name is File:Carnegie Free Library in Beaver Falls.jpg. Nyttend (talk) 04:26, 28 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Ditto with the Greersburg Academy picture. I've now uploaded two pictures of Legionville:   and  . The fields picture is currently at the National Register list for Beaver County; do you think that the monument would be better? Nyttend (talk) 20:31, 2 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the opinion. I am too familiar with the sun bit; it's just that the sun was directly behind the monument, so I didn't really have a choice. Nyttend (talk) 11:46, 8 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
Two more pictures are now on Commons: the Lowrie House and the Butler County Courthouse. As for posting pictures: of the ten sites, four already have pictures, so I myself won't upload them. I didn't get too good of a shot of the Butler National Bank, while I think I'll post the bank-and-Lowrie-House-and-courthouse picture for the district, and you didn't get a picture for Elm Court. What about the other three: Roebling House, Passavant House, and armory? I'll not care if you post pictures for those three as well as for the bank; just getting to see all these sites, the two former churches (one of the pictures of the rural church is now at Forward Township, Butler County, Pennsylvania), and the lock structure (which is now approved for DYK) was quite good enough, regardless of whether I post any more pictures :-) Nyttend (talk) 04:59, 13 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Bell tower

edit

Sorry if I told you this already (can't remember), but I got the pictures after the head librarian invited me to climb up to the top with him while maintenance was being performed. Not an issue of trespassing :-) Nyttend (talk) 02:08, 19 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

NRHP sites

edit

As you may remember, when you called on Monday, I was out looking for some old Indian mounds; you can see them in the Logan County section of National Register of Historic Places listings in Ohio under Dunns Pond Mound and Lake Ridge Island Mounds. The mounds on Lake Ridge Island were hard to find — the one I found was probably the smallest of the group — but Dunns Pond was easier, so getting a good site wasn't a problem. And I've been successful getting other sites, too; see File:Driveway view of The Fort.jpg and File:Martin Marmon House.jpg, both taken today. Nyttend (talk) 04:31, 20 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Greersburg Academy

edit

The list is here; one can simply go back into the article history and find what it was like before my recent edits. If I remember rightly, lists like this aren't considered the best format; what do you think about changing the list into prose?

Sorry that I only called last week when you were busy. I'll be in the area on the weekend of the 8th for a wedding, although I'll mostly be staying in eastern Lawrence County (near Rose Point), and only one night (if any) will I be in Beaver Falls. Nyttend (talk) 00:52, 14 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Old Main and NRHP

edit

What wording would you suggest: perhaps something that it is the core of a group of buildings eligible for listing as a historic district? Or do I misunderstand your point? The reason I wrote what I did is that the entry gives the date of construction as 1880, and while McCartney, Fern Cliffe, Memorial, Pearce, and McKee might be able to be contributing properties, I can't see the entire campus as being eligible, so I thought the safest statement was to say that Old Main was eligible. Nyttend (talk) 02:17, 2 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

By the way, did you get to go to the Raccoon Creek RDA and the David Littell House? If so, could you upload the pictures soon? They're the only NRHP sites in Beaver County without pictures online right now. Nyttend (talk) 02:19, 2 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
To get to the page that I was talking about last week at Homecoming, follow this procedure:
  • Go to Wikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places
  • Find the line beginning with "For Pennsylvania, the state office's ARCH system"
  • Click either the "ARCH" link or the "CRGIS" link
  • If you go to ARCH, click "Go directly to search" and enter the data; this will bring up all sites that fit. For example, selecting only the county line and putting in Beaver County will give you all twenty sites. From this page, you can access nomination forms, such as this for the library in Beaver Falls.
  • If you go to CRGIS, click on the CRGIS logo at the bottom of the page, login as a guest, and enter data. You will get a map of the area that you pick, with points of interest (including tons of non-NRHP sites) shown as little triangles, squares, or other polygons; if you select an NRHP site, it will provide a link for the nomination form. Note that they're not always plotted exactly rightly; a building at 501 - 505 7th Avenue in Beaver Falls is shown northwest of the library, even though it's actually 8 blocks to the south. You'll need to download and install a program to view this map properly; I don't remember what it is, but when it prompts you to download and install, don't worry that it's malicious.
Hope this helps! Nyttend (talk) 21:52, 14 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

NowCommons: File:Butler,PA.JPG

edit

File:Butler,PA.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Butler,PA.JPG. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Butler,PA.JPG]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 12:30, 24 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Baldinger's Market

edit

Not sure what to do with this article. I happened across it and added a link to the official website, but while there I noticed that you lifted most of their "About" page for the article. I don't want to AfD it because I believe the article deserves to exist. Somehow, it's stood essentially like this for two and a half years now. I'm marking it with {{advert}} and hopefully that'll trigger a rewrite.

In any case, thanks for posting the article about this historical landmark. Hopefully the article can be improved to avoid the deletionists out there! --Jemiller226 (talk) 19:24, 9 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

We at WP:NRHP have identified several problems with nationalregisterofhistoricplaces.com. Among them are the way it passes itself off — looking at it, you'd think that it was the official National Register website, rather than a private site; there's a tiny disclaimer at the bottom of the page, but the website's overall presentation of itself is rather disingenuous. As well, it contains many errors, because the people who set up the site didn't interpret the National Register database information properly. For an example of this, look at the Lawrence County page. Although we know that there are nine Lawrence County sites on the Register, if you believed nationalregisterofhistoricplaces.com, you'd think that there were ten: it's not been updated to show the Scottish Rite Cathedral, but it shows two places, the Wilroy Furnace and St. Mary's Roman Catholic Church, that aren't on the Register. Nyttend (talk) 04:25, 8 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Winter Classic

edit

The Winter Classic is not a tenant at any of those stadiums. I love the Pens, but because overzealous hockey fans have it wrong on other articles, it does not make it right for Heinz Field, whose accuracy I am primarily concerned with. The inclusion of the Winter Classic as a tenant in the Heinz Field article, or the addition of any other one time event like concerts or other special events, is incorrect. Actually, the WPIAL Championships is borderline for inclusion as a tenant, but at least that is annually reoccurring. See Template:Infobox stadium for a definition of the tenant field. It may be worth trying to get a new field inserted in that infobox for the listing of major special events like the Winter Classic, etc. CrazyPaco (talk) 02:45, 12 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Notification of automated file description generation

edit

Your upload of File:BellofMars.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:08, 30 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

any chance of getting some photos?

edit

I'm particularly interested in Armstrong County, PA, Plumcreek township, Kittanning township, Pine Township, Elderton borough, Perry township and Atwood borough. Please see User:Nyttend/Pennsylvania#Armstrong County, 5 or List of municipalities in Pennsylvania. Smallbones(smalltalk) 00:00, 2 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Mvincec. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply