MulgaBill

Norfolk Island, or something

Creeping senility as an excuse is quite legitimate, methinks, but I couldn't claim it, for in my case, sleep deprivation would seem more appropriate, but as an excuse for my various editing mishaps it's starting to get kind of trite, so I'll settle instead for something more precise but less accurate, namely, that I couldn't stomach letting my future self look back on these days and falsely remember me as flawless, failure, however slight, being, stereotypically at least, part of the pathway to greater success, giving us, I suppose, both a self-fulfilling prophecy and a run-on sentence (not to mention an article request). Congrats, BTW, on the Morisset and Price articles; I enjoyed reading them. Chris Roy 16:14, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Please follow Wikipedia:Naming conventions when choosing titles of articles. Thanks. Gamaliel 3 July 2005 00:19 (UTC)

It was my pleasure

Thanks for saying you thought this was a "great article" - the early British settlement of Australia is a favourite topic of mine as I have First Fleet and convict ancestors. If I had time, I would contribute much more. MulgaBill 23:37, 30 July 2005 (UTC)

, No, thank you for great edits on Wikipedia. Please come contribute with us more, we'd love to have you. (And no, I haven't been on Wikipedia all day, I just got back on the computer, I mean, I'm not that addicted). Take care, : ). Dbraceyrules 03:16, 31 July 2005 (UTC)

List of Australian Test cricketers

Hi, not really. It seems to be the convention that we use an individual's "known as" name rather than their birth name. eg. Richie Benaud and not Richard Benaud, Greg Chappell and not Gregory Chappell. In the case of Tom Garrett, according to Cricinfo [1] he was known as Tom rather than Thomas, and as there is no other article called Tom Garrett, it seems logical for the link to be Tom Garrett. I think you'd use Tom Garrett (cricketer) (or Thomas Garrett (cricketer)) only if there was an existing article and you needed to disambiguate. - Ian ≡ talk 08:27, 5 August 2005 (UTC)

• Just a note. Alick and Alec are both fine. There are two different versions.Tintin 03:39, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

• • Thanks but I have no preference either way. Tintin 04:31, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

Who remanded Peate

Bill: My apologies. That change was mistakenly overwritten during my last revert. It's fixed now. -- Ian ≡ talk 07:21, 15 August 2005 (UTC)

Roberta Sykes

You are aware, I hope, that Roberta Sykes is not actually an indigenous Australian? Her mother is white and her father was an African-American serviceman. She was unaware of this until adulthood, and so far as I know she still identifes as an indigenous Australian. But any article on her would have to state this fact. Adam 22:01, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

AFL

G'day mate, just wondering if you'd be interested in joining the WikiProject AFL. I've made the project and been creating stacks of articles solo, and I need to find others that can help me out with expanding everything. I've done a hell of a lot, I just need more participants and then this project will be cooking with oil. Cheers, Rogerthat 11:18, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Umpires

Great work, but I am not through with the proof reading yet :) Tintin Talk 03:10, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

In some articles like Clement Garing, Melbourne is aliased to Victoria. Is it deliberate ? Tintin Talk 03:23, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

I am done for today. If the Melbourne|Victoria was done deliberately, please revert my change in Arthur Wyeth, but it would be better to have Victoria (Australia) than the plain Victoria. Once again, great stuff; very few of us could have done what you have done here. Tintin Talk 03:35, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Does this make sense?

I am a bit confused still. Can you please take a look at the change here. Clement Garing's place of death is currently Melbourne|Victoria. Please check whether Garing should be changed to the format of Wyeth, or if Wyeth should be reverted. Tintin Talk 04:01, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

No, I am very happy with current version. My disagreement was only with the older version that appeared in the Garing article. Tintin Talk 04:25, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

If you look at the Cricketarchive or Cricinfo page, they have spelt the name of the place 'May..' instead of 'Mary..'. But it is quite possible that they have erred (which is not that rare). Good to know that my edits are helpful. Tintin Talk 22:03, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

Cool ! Meanwhile, Cricketarchive site is down again. Wonder what is happening there. Tintin Talk 23:01, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

It went down the first time some 30 hours ago. Since then it has been up only for 2-3 hours. Tintin Talk 23:14, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

Can I suggest an addition ? Tintin Talk 03:37, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Maybe something more about the controversies that the umpires were invovled in - like Mick Harvey in Miandad/Hogg runout at MCG 78/9, about Crafter ending up between DK and Miandad in the second most famous photo of an umpire, Egar/Hoy in Wally Grout's fallen bail incident in the final Test of 60/61 etc ?

Feel free to ignore all these, but if you don't mention the name of Gavaskar when you write Whitehead's article, I'll add it myself :-) Tintin Talk 03:49, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

John Scott (cricketer)

I thought that since you created John Scott (umpire), I ought to let you know that I have just merged it into John Scott (cricketer) which was about the same chap. Please do look over my merging and improve the new article if you want! →Ollie (talk • contribs) 00:13, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Australia newsletter

WikiProject Australia publishes a newsletter informing Australian Wikipedians of ongoing events and happenings within the community and the project. This month's newsletter has been published. If you wish to unsubscribe from these messages, or prefer to have the newsletter delivered in full to your talk page, see our subscription page. This notice delivered by BrownBot (talk), at 21:53, 11 December 2007 (UTC).

WikiProject Australia newsletter

WikiProject Australia publishes a newsletter informing Australian Wikipedians of ongoing events and happenings within the community and the project. This month's newsletter has been published. If you wish to unsubscribe from these messages, or prefer to have the newsletter delivered in full to your talk page, see our subscription page. This notice delivered by BrownBot (talk), at 22:01, 3 January 2008 (UTC).

WikiProject Australia newsletter,December 2008

The December 2008 issue of the WikiProject Australia newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. This message was delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 07:37, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Melbourne meetup

Hey all, just a reminder that there's a meetup tomorrow at 11am in North Melbourne. There are more details at the meetup page. Hope to see you tomorrow! SteveBot (talk) 04:48, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Meetup invitation: Melbourne 26

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup next Sunday (6 January). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 26. Hope to see you there! John Vandenberg 07:46, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Victoria)

RfC:Infobox Road proposal

WP:AURD (Australian Roads), is inviting comment on a proposal to convert Australian road articles to {{infobox road}}. Please come and discuss. The vote will be after concerns have been looked into.

• Wikipedia:WikiProject Australian Roads/RfC:Infobox Road proposal

You are being notified as a member on the list of WP:AUS

Nbound (talk) 22:42, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Fair Use in Australia discussion

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

Proposed deletion of Robert Hunt (British Army officer)

The article Robert Hunt (British Army officer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:19, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Arthur Cocks (umpire)

The article Arthur Cocks (umpire) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. Only umpired one test. Article talks about the match and not the individual

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BarcodeIII (talk) 20:49, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Joseph Richards (umpire)

The article Joseph Richards (umpire) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

does not meet WP:BASIC

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Proposed deletion of Andrew Barlow

The article Andrew Barlow has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

does not meet WP:BASIC

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Proposed deletion of P. Coady

The article P. Coady has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

does not meet WP:BASIC

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Proposed deletion of Tom Flynn (umpire)

The article Tom Flynn (umpire) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

does not meet WP:BASIC

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Proposed deletion of James Laing (cricketer)

The article James Laing (cricketer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

does not meet WP:BASIC

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Proposed deletion of George Edward Downs

The article George Edward Downs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

does not meet WP:BASIC

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Proposed deletion of Richard Callaway

The article Richard Callaway has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.