MugsWrit (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Decline reason:
No, it was "possible" and the closing clerk blocked on the combined evidence—within their discretion. And frankly, I would have blocked on just the behavioral evidence. — Daniel Case (talk) 16:50, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Thank you for confirming your IP address. Abusing multiple accounts also includes using edits from your IP address to evade blocks and to cause further disruption. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:11, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- admit it. You guys don't play nice. Deleting a page isn't disruptive. Why don't you guys worry more about building an encyclopedia than chasing other people off? MugsWrit (talk) 12:52, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- try to stop someone from using google or Facebook and surely people will look at you funny. MugsWrit (talk) 12:54, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Nothing to admit. We have rules here (whether we all like them or not) and we chase people off who cannot abide by them. FaceBook & Google are poor comparisons - they are not encyclopedias. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:49, 13 June 2013 (UTC)