Duplicate images uploaded

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Mourad Baziz.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Momo mogshot.jpg. The copy called Image:Momo mogshot.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 11:29, 18 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Delilah Djabelkhir

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Delilah Djabelkhir requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. bonadea contributions talk 16:11, 12 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

I read what you wrote on the talk page but I have still deleted the article, because I do not believe that Delilah Djabelkhir, who became a full-time artist less than a year ago, meets Wikipedia's entry requirements. In order to avoid speedy deletion it is only necessary to make a credible claim of importance or significance (which your article did not do); but if the article is to be kept it is necessary to establish notability, which is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Significant means more than just listing-type mentions; reliable excludes Myspace, Facebook, blogs, places where anyone can post anything; independent excludes the subject's own website, affiliated ones and anything based on press releases. The test is, have people indepndent of the artist thought her important enough to write substantial comment about? There is more information at WP:Notability (people), especially the section WP:ARTIST. I looked to see whether I could find references, in which case I would have added them or given you time to add them, but
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
confirmed my view that this artist's career has not (yet) reached the level needed for a Wikipedia article. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 16:35, 12 June 2011 (UTC)Reply