{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Number 57 15:44, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Motuna (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I added content as "Racism on Mesut Ozil" to first, UEFA Euro 2024 and then Racism in Germany but deemed disruptive. I allege that it is not. Although I asked for advice, I've been blocked Motuna (talk) 16:26, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You've been warned a bunch of times to stop editing against consensus and participate in discussion instead. Your last warning was a very unambiguous "do that and be blocked". You chose to ignore it and the resulting block looks perfectly reasonable. Max Semenik (talk) 19:07, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Motuna (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Please let an impartial neutral to comment on the issue, not on procedures. I am adding a racism content to a racism topic. Consensus does not mean to agree with someone who is able to block users. Let a non-Germanic admin to review it please, preferably someone who is not bien-pensant. You kids are damaging the spirit of Wikipedia Motuna (talk) 10:50, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I concur with the validity of the block. You edited against consensus and have not listened to comments on your user talk page. I am declining this request. I would add that the race of any admin is not relevant(and you have no way of knowing what that might be for any user anyway) and I suggest that you not bring that up again. 331dot (talk) 11:07, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- (edit conflict) The national/racial/cultural identity of an admin is not relevant when considering blocks for policy breaches. I agree with the block, with Max Semenik's decline of your first unblock request, and with 331dot's decline of the second one. You need to start listening and change your approach to handling content disputes, or you will surely end up facing longer blocks. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:12, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
- Oh, and any further personal attacks (like calling people "kids") and you will lose your ability to edit this talk page too. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:14, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
Motuna (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Is there anyone who is able to tell me what Wikipedia rule is against to add racism content to a racism topic? Motuna (talk) 17:06, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This is not the place to continue your argument about the content you were trying to add - administrators do not judge content disputes, only behavioural issues. You are blocked for edit warring to insert material which was clearly contested by others, and that is simply not allowed. What you needed to do was stop, discuss, and wait for consensus, but you would not do that. There is not a specific rule about every kind of content which might be added to every kind of article - surely you can see that would impossible? So whether a specific piece of content should be included is decided by discussion and consensus, and there are many possible reasons why something that you think should be included would not be supported by consensus (for example, WP:UNDUE - I'm not sure if that is specifically applicable here, I just offer it as an example). See WP:EW and WP:Consensus, and have a read of the guidance at WP:BRD. If you do not address your repeated breaches of these core policies, you will not be unblocked. And if your next unblock request does not address your behaviour, you will lose the ability to edit this talk page for the duration of the block. And further, if you return to the same behaviour after the block expires, you will be blocked again for longer - in fact, your stubborn refusal to listen to what four admins have told you almost led me to extend the block here and now. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:31, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.