Hi,
I moved your info to Kx'a languages, where IMO details of the family belong. — kwami (talk) 23:44, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Fine if you think it belongs there, but the thing on ethnologue is not greenbergs classification. it is a combination of the classification of two languages. it is the description of eastern hoan but the classification of the taa dialect. the ju family was classified by greenberg as northern khoisan and tuu as southern.
it is easy to confuse and this is what happened.
take care!
- The Ethnologue description of the Khoisan languages is horrible. What the hell is "Vasekela", for example? Nonetheless, they have a distinct language code for a language of this name, for which they say Sasi is a dialect, so I see no reason not to use it. Based on similar screw ups in the past, I expect that E will retain the code and correct the information assigned to it. Unless Khoisanists are of the opinion that it is best avoided, and that a new iso3 code needs to be created for it? — kwami (talk) 12:03, 22 February 2011 (UTC)