Welcome!

Welcome! (We can't say that loud/big enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page.

We're so glad you're here! If you need help or just want to say hello, click here and leave a message! [1] -- Phgao 12:06, 19 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Re: Livemocha.com edit

You might want to read the General Notability Guide and the Guide to Web content to help improve this article. The general idea is that in order to be notable, it should be established that a subject has appeared OUTSIDE of Wikipedia and outside of ITSELF in some third-party reliable sources, and that those appearences amount to substantial coverage. Finding some external, third-party review of this website would go a LONG way towards establishing notability. --Jayron32|talk|contribs 06:09, 26 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

OK, the website seems not to be that famous I thought first :) --Mohsens 07:34, 26 October 2007 (UTC)Reply


Redirect of Lovemocha.com edit

 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Lovemocha.com, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Lovemocha.com is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Lovemocha.com, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 07:36, 27 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Martin-Heidegger-philosophy-of-being-a-critical-interpretation-Herman-Philipse.jpg) edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Martin-Heidegger-philosophy-of-being-a-critical-interpretation-Herman-Philipse.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 01:44, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please do not restore this image to Martin Heidegger edit

Please do not re-insert the image Image:Martin-Heidegger-philosophy-of-being-a-critical-interpretation-Herman-Philipse.jpg in the article Martin Heidegger. [2] [3] It is not acceptable for fair use because Heidegger's physical appearance is not important in this article. Also, other images simply depicting Heidegger probably exist, and a free use alternative can probably be found. In this case, it is better to have no image than a fair use image. / edg 09:22, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Martin Heidegger, as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.' Thank you. / edg 09:25, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Martin-Heidegger-philosophy-of-being-a-critical-interpretation-Herman-Philipse.jpg) edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Martin-Heidegger-philosophy-of-being-a-critical-interpretation-Herman-Philipse.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 03:53, 18 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:Mixed-en.png edit

 
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Mixed-en.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz talk 22:47, 1 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re: Email edit

Hi, I got your email. Unfortunately, I'm not able to remove those edits, as I don't have the oversight right. In order to remove edits from the database, you should shoot an email off to Requests for Oversight. Hope this helps! (X! · talk)  · @693  ·  15:38, 4 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Pierre-Bourdieu-A-Critical-Introduction-Jeremy-F-Lane.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Pierre-Bourdieu-A-Critical-Introduction-Jeremy-F-Lane.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:25, 12 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Mohsens. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply