Sri Krishna Arts and Science College

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sri Krishna Arts and Science College, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.skasc.ac.in/about.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:05, 17 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sri Krishna Arts and Science College

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sri Krishna Arts and Science College, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.skasc.ac.in/about.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:24, 17 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Sri Krishna Arts and Science College

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Sri Krishna Arts and Science College requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tim Ross (talk) 09:26, 14 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

    • I've deleted the article. First of all, even if you are a student at this college, that doesn't mean you own the website's copyright. And even if you do own it, you cannot just copy and paste its content into Wikipedia. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, which means it has style guidelines and standards for inclusion. Like R'n'B said, if you want to write about "recessionism", you need to write a new article, fitting Wikipedia standards, that explains what it is and why it deserves to be in an encyclopedia; you can't just paste your website into Wikipedia. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 15:46, 15 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Worldtamilconference2010 Logo 01.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Worldtamilconference2010 Logo 01.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:09, 8 July 2011 (UTC)Reply