Mlavoritano

K’NEX Education

1. It has no references to show that it meets the [Wikipedia:Notability|notability guidelines]]
2. It is written like an advertisement as they strive to meet and exceed national, state, and local... standards (assume it's used in the US?)
3. Developed after research and consultation with teachers across America (source?) provides students with real world, concrete examples that clarify abstract concepts and strengthen understanding.

If you make claims for a product, you must show that it is notable and that any claims for its effectiveness have independent verifiable references - otherwise it's spam. Jimfbleak (talk) 18:13, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your message. I can do no better than agree with Jimfbleak's comments, and reiterate that you have a conflict of interest, as you work for the company concerned, and therefore shouldn't be writing about them anyway, as to do so conflicts with the requirement that edits be from a neutral point of view. _GB^T/C 19:46, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Well, certainly 1. above applies - there's nothing to show why the company is notable, thus meriting inclusion in Wikipedia. Any claims of notability, as with 3, have to be backed up by verifiable reliable sources. _GB^T/C 20:06, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Start it in your sandbox (so on this page - User:Mlavoriano/Sandbox) first - you'll get a bit more leeway and time to get the article up to scratch than you would if it were in the main article space. When you're ready, pop a request on somewhere like the administrators' noticeboard asking someone to comment and, if appropriate, move it or help you move it over to the mainspace. _GB^T/C 20:48, 27 May 2008 (UTC)