Thanks for your edit to Race and health edit

Just to let you know, I've started a conversation about the edit at a noticeboard where a lot of science-literate editors hang out so that we can get their feedback. There seems to be a lot of useful information in what you added but it will need to be copy edited, at the very least, to make it accessible for our readers. I don't intend to discourage you from contributing to the encyclopedia, however! This kind of scrutiny is a normal part of the process, especially when your contribution is substantial. Cheers, Generalrelative (talk) 17:28, 23 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for File:Age Adjusted rate of overdose deaths.png edit

Thanks for uploading File:Age Adjusted rate of overdose deaths.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:30, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Opioid crisis content edit

Perhaps you could take a look at this revert. It seems grossly unfair to say that this was a rebuttal to the letter itself. The problem was the way the letter was being misrepresented. Also, take a look at the editing history of the article about that letter. None of the reverts have anything to do with actual content. 201.71.2.255 (talk) 10:06, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply