Welcome

edit
Hello, Guilaneman, and Welcome to Wikipedia!    

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Guilaneman, good luck, and have fun. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:24, 6 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

March 2019

edit

  Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Safra Basteh. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Alexf(talk) 12:48, 11 March 2019 (UTC)Reply


Hi Alexf,

I’m from Iran and Gilan province that Safra Basteh is about; and I love writing and completing articles about this region.

In this subject; this website, that I referenced to is one of the completest websites

As you said Wikipedia external links are nofollow and don’t important for search engines

 
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | talk 19:03, 11 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

this account doesnt spam! and its belong to a person!

 
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Meysamzare23 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

because of changing my username to my real name

Decline reason:

You forgot to address your inappropriate edits. Yamla (talk) 19:23, 11 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

thanks

 
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Meysamzare23 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

Because of changing my username to my real name. I understand that my username should be independent I have alot of information about this region and I didn't know how to use it for improving Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

The proposed new username is acceptable. However, the other elements of the block still need to be addressed. To be unblocked:

If you have no interest in editing Wikipedia beyond writing about your organization, then you will not be unblocked. If this is the case, I recommend you consider alternative outlets.

So we know understanding is mutual, please state your understanding/response to each item in your own words.

I'm sorry that this message could not be more favorable. 331dot (talk) 20:02, 11 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Meysamzare23 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

Because of changing my username to my real name. I understand that my username should be independent I have alot of information about this region and I didn't know how to use it for improving Wikipedia.

I confirm that this Account is used only by me I will not edit articles that directly related my organization I will edit with no false intentions I accept Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use

I will improve the contents about iran region

Decline reason:

So sorry, unable to rename to mrmeysam .

edit

We already have a mrmeysam. Please make another selection. DlohCierekim 13:02, 12 March 2019 (UTC)Reply


 
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Meysamzare23 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

Because of changing my username to my real name. I understand that my username should be independent I have alot of information about this region and I didn't know how to use it for improving Wikipedia.

I confirm that this Account is used only by me I will not edit articles that directly related my organization I will edit with no false intentions I accept Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use

I will improve the contents about iran region

Accept reason:

Unblocked on the condition that you will not link to your own website per below. Huon (talk) 16:42, 12 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

As noted above, that username or close variations of it is taken. You will need to choose something substantially different. You do not need to make a completely new unblock request, please simply edit your existing request to remove "Mr.meysam" and replace it with your new choice. 331dot (talk) 10:41, 13 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

I have renamed your account from Guilaneman, and someone else will review your request. 331dot (talk) 10:47, 13 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
thank a lot. Meysamzare23 (talk) 10:52, 13 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Bishonen, I'd be willing to assume good faith here and to unblock, under the provision that Meysamzare23 reviews WP:Identifying reliable sources and that they agree not to link to their own website. Any objections? Huon (talk) 11:16, 11 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Not at all, that's fine by me, Huon. Bishonen | talk 15:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC).Reply
Meysamzare23, do you agree to an unblock under the condition that you do not link to your own website? You should also review WP:Identifying reliable sources which explains why your own website is not reliable by Wikipedia's standards (beyond the conflict of interest and linkspam issues), and what kinds of sources we should use instead. Huon (talk) 17:02, 11 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
Yes, I agree with the terms that you noticed and I wont link to unreliable source and I will work with Wikipedia standards.Meysamzare23 (talk) 19:13, 11 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

writing about gilan

edit

All content must be cited from reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking. DlohCierekim 13:04, 12 March 2019 (UTC)Reply