The article Librarywala has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:42, 29 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Librarywala, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. No more advertising, please. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:47, 29 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Librarywala, you will be blocked from editing. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:51, 29 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Librarywala

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Librarywala, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. hydrox (talk) 22:04, 29 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, the appropriate section is actually G12 as there was no debate whatsoever. Still, this is clearly advertising. hydrox (talk) 22:06, 29 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
Links for Wikipedians interested in India content
 

Welcome kit

Register

Network

Contribute content

naveenpf (talk) 07:27, 24 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Librarywala

edit
 

The article Librarywala has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:35, 24 September 2015 (UTC)Reply