A belated welcome! edit

 
Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!  

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Menschmaster. I see that you've already been around awhile and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Visik (Chinwag Podium) 06:28, 23 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Distaudio edit

 

The article Distaudio has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no real claim to notability, releases not on important label, airplay not national rotation, lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. original research.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:11, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Distaudio for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Distaudio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Distaudio until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:39, 21 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed a file deletion tag from Distaudio. When removing deletion tags, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:04, 24 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi Menschmaster, I see you've disagreed with the suggestion that the article on Distaudio should be deleted. You're agument on the talk page of the afd is liable to be missed, arguments need to be made at the page of the afd itself, not the talk page. I have copied you're !vote to the afd page, If you have more to add the afd page is the right palce to go. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:04, 24 July 2011 (UTC)Reply