calling coal towns a lie edit

I lived it. I am not a liar. The action by the IP user was grossly insulting. Can we ban them?Coal town guy (talk) 23:47, 11 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

I did not add that piece of vandalism, that was produced by an anonymous IP after I edited adding a "See Also" section, see here. I am not familiar with the penal process here at Wikipedia, sorry Coal Town Guy! Memtgs (talk) 00:22, 12 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Any chance of some help? edit

Hi. I've recently, from scratch, begun an article on a 19th c. song called 'Villikins and his Dinah'. It was mainly to practise editing skills and I chose the topic almost at random; but since I have access through my library to some good contemporary sources for the period when the song came out, it seemed it would be easy enough to do. I think I overlooked the fact I understand nothing about music. I would be grateful for some suggestions on how to improve the article.RLamb (talk) 22:49, 5 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Memtgs, I would really appreciate your help. A sort of fog descends on my mind when I try to think about the melody bit.
I searched on Google books and found several mentions of the tune's history in what seems a very good book by Ed Cray, The Erotic Muse. When he writes about some tune in a 17th c. manuscript being suggested as a possible source, I can just about understand him. When he writes: '‘Members of the “Villikins” tune family are most easily spotted by the introductory tonic, then the outline of the major triad in the first bar(s) and the repeated fifth that follows immediately’, he loses me.RLamb (talk) 18:17, 13 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for explaining. My brain has just died...:RLamb (talk) 19:06, 23 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
Let me know if there's anything I can do to help revive it :D Memtgs (talk | contribs) @ 19:25, 23-08-2013 UTC 19:25, 23 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for August 24 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Villikins and his Dinah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rutland, Vermont (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:01, 24 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Barbara Allen illustration by Henry Brock 1934.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Barbara Allen illustration by Henry Brock 1934.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:47, 29 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for September 7 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Ballad of Chevy Chase, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Percy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 7 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

February 2016 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Barbara Allen (song) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • at the [[British Library]], the [[Huntington Library]], and the [[National Library of Scotland]]) <ref>{{cite web|title=EBBA|url=http://ebba.english.ucsb.edu/search_combined/?ss=barbara+allen|

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:05, 17 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Notification about disabling the Wikipedia collections tool edit

Thank you for using the collections feature in Wikipedia beta! Due to technical and moderation issues, we will be turning off this experimental feature. Your collections will be available for viewing and export until March 1st. If you would like to save your collection as links on a special Wikipedia page, please fill out the following form. If you are interested in giving your feedback about Wikipedia Collections please do so here.

Thanks,

Jon Katz
Product manager, Wikimedia Foundation
Jkatz (WMF) (talk) 23:53, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Memtgs. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Memtgs. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

January 2018 edit

 

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Myofascial release. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Alexbrn (talk) 17:17, 5 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, please use the talk page and dispute resolution page. I am attempting to make better edits and your constant accusations and revisions are making that a very difficult experience. Memtgs (talk | contribs) @ 17:20, 5-01-2018 UTC 17:20, 5 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Notice edit

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Complementary and Alternative Medicine, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Alexbrn (talk) 17:19, 5 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Memtgs. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply