Mdmadden

Alex Jones - No edit summaries

In the future, be sure to use Edit Summaries which explain the changes you are making to the article you are editing. -- Somedifferentstuff (talk) 07:19, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Please do not start this again, take any edits to talk page first.Slatersteven (talk) 15:48, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Somedifferentstuff, Hi there, hadn't seen your comment here before last edit. Start what, sorry? Mdmadden (talk) 16:05, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Adding swaths of material that will just get deleted for example how is his ancestry about his early life, and how did he start the Texan revolution?Slatersteven (talk) 16:08, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Why would it "just get deleted"? Where did it say he started the Texan revolution? Please quote, not following you there...(?) Mdmadden (talk) 16:10, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

"Jones has declared ancestry "at the core on both sides" of his family, starting the 1835 Texas Revolution against General Santa Anna."

That says (in effect) that his discussion of his ancestry stated the Texan revolution.Slatersteven (talk) 16:12, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

And what has this to do with his early life, he was not alive at the time?Slatersteven (talk) 16:15, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

No that's not really how "in effect" works. eg. my grandfather helped defeat the Nazis. Doesn't mean (in effect) that I did. His other ancestry is in the 'Early Life' section, maybe we should have a subsection on ancestry alone, that will likely help. I will raise with you on subject talk page, from here on out. It's not the best place for this conversation here. Cheers. Mdmadden (talk) 16:19, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

No but that is not what it says. This is like saying that "My grandmother was important to me and WW2 started". You need to reword this to make any sense.Slatersteven (talk) 16:26, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Will will reply no more here, lets keep this in one place.Slatersteven (talk) 16:27, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Ok, will do. Thanks Mdmadden (talk) 16:28, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Please stop adding dubious or poorly sourced material, read sources before adding them please.Slatersteven (talk) 17:13, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Slatersteven, what is the source in question, and what aspect of it didn't correlate with added text to Wikipedia? Please provide evidence to claims. Mdmadden (talk) 17:14, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Your source for the claim Jones believes Trump has weather weaponize, it does not say Trump (try looking at the date it was published).Slatersteven (talk) 17:16, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

The date is post-Donald Trump's election. Either way, good point, the claim is about the office of President, not whoever personally is President. I'll change it, cheers Mdmadden (talk) 17:19, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

It was not post inauguration.Slatersteven (talk) 17:21, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Exactly, good point. Mdmadden (talk) 17:22, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

This is why we are asking you to suggest edits on the talk page first, it save a lot of work undoing faulty edits.Slatersteven (talk) 17:23, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Voluntary return, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nordic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:29, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

What the lead if for

Please read MOS:LEAD.Slatersteven (talk) 17:36, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Metro

I've moved the section you added to Metro (British newspaper) to metro.co.uk as the article was authored by a digital content creator and presumably did not also appear in the newspaper. --79.75.144.206 (talk) 01:50, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited British Independence Day, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National holiday (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CyboDuck, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 18:16, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions on Skepticism

Hi Mdmadden, We’ve noticed that you edited articles related to Skepticism. Thank you for your great contributions. Keep it up! Bobo.03 (talk) 02:55, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

April 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 19:21, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mdmadden. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)