re

edit

i'm not ignoring anything. The references which were alreayd there are far more encyclopedic and they're not contradicting with what you're trying to say, but the way you're formulated those phrases and the percents you're forwarding are not sustainig the content. First please reach concensous at talk page Rezistenta (talk) 11:45, 30 June 2008 (UTC)Reply


re 2

edit

In contradiction with you, I do not have an oppinion of my own, but I merely try to write in real data and not to search studies which are convinient to my own believes.

re 3

edit

funny because the opinion and percents displayed by you in the content are not forwarded by any of those sources, and if you're indeed romanian let's talk better in our native language, shall we? Rezistenta (talk) 12:04, 30 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Recent editing and reverting

edit

Hello there. I've been asked to look at your recent contributions on Romanians, and it looks like you're getting into a bit of an edit war. While your sourced contributions are welcome, it's important to retain a neutral point of view and avoid using weasel words.If you're in a content dispute with another editor, instead of undoing their changes please use the article's talk page in order to reach an agreement on what to include. If that doesn't work, there are a number of dispute resolution mechanisms that you can use. Should you have any questions or concerns, please ask. Many thanks, Gazimoff WriteRead 13:07, 30 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

re 4

edit

Ro: 1. Cum am mai spus, mi se pare ca gresesti si cred ca interpretezi gresit cifrele avansate de Rootsi si altii la [[1]]. Ai citit atent documentele? Poate ca nu... Ai sa gasesti la capitolul "Balcani", pagina 3 sau 130 in articolul lui Rootsi, datele privind Romania. 2. In celalalt document, [[2]], la paginile 56 si in capitolul 5.2.4. vei gasi datele necesare si o discutie privind barierele in Europa de est intre haplogrupuri, care m-au facut sa scriu concluziile respective.

En: 1. As I was previously saying, I find that you are wrong interpreting the numbers and informations advanced by Rootsi et al., at [[3]]. Have you read the documents? Maybe not... You will find at chapter "Balkans" page 3 or 130 in the Rootsi's paper, the datas concerning Romania. 2. In the other document,[[4]] at pages 56 and in chapter 5.2.4. you will also find the necessary data and a discussion concerning the barriers among haplogroups, which made me reach the conclusions I wrote.

MedCab

edit

Apologies for the delay, but the Mediation Cabal is backed up a bit right now. What's the status of this dispute? Has it solved itself, or is there still a need to form an agreement? --The Prophet Wizard of the Crayon Cake 19:10, 18 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Romania

edit
 
Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in contributing to WikiProject Romania. It is a project aimed at organizing and improving the quality and accuracy of articles related to Romania. Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 04:25, 21 January 2012 (UTC)Reply