Mario.radin

Re: Please!

The image you described was deleted serveral times in WP:IfD, if you want that to be recreated you have to go through WP:DRV. --WinHunter ^(talk) 00:23, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

prod vandalsim

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Your recent prods

WP:PROD is for uncontroversial deletions, and anyone can remove a prod for any reason. Articles should only be prod'ed once. If you still think the article(s) should be deleted, take it for discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, but please do not reinsert the prod notice, no matter how valid you think it is. Mr Stephen 13:08, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Last warning

If you continue removing valid information from Wikipedia as you did here, you will be clocked from editing Wikipedia. --Dijxtra 14:55, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Who made it valid? You???--Mario.radin 15:48, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Yup, I did. That's how Wikipedia works. If you think that information is not valid, feel free to add that article to WP:AfD. --Dijxtra 18:47, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Sure thing - I'm done it already. Please, do not leave any text on this talk page anymore!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mario.radin (talk • contribs)

First of all, this is your "talk page" and anybody is free to write on it. Second, please sign your comments so we know who wrote them. Third, full procedure for requesting deletion is described here: Template:AfD footer. Please read it and then do the steps noted there. You didn't execute step 3 of the procedure. Until you do that, your request is invalid. --Dijxtra 14:28, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Both AFDs are invalid anyway. I have deleted them, and I have blocked Mario for a week. Adam Bishop 16:09, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Mirko Norac

Thanks for your interest in your role played with the Mirko Norac article. I was in the process of reading the Afd about it and was in the middle of leaving a reply that I thought it should be kept but edited, made neutral or etc in the case that it wasn't neutral. Right as I tried to leave my reply I saw that Adam Bishop had deleted it I think on the grounds for being bad faith. I hope you don't mind but I undeleted the article and did my best to edit it and make it neutral

Personally, I'd had no knowledge of Mirko Norac and am neutral as far as to whatever his or his followers or dejectors have to say about him. But in all due respect I hate seeing one's ideas censored. I think we should encourage others to make Wikipedia the best we can. If what I've submitted is neutral, I hope that not anyone else reverts it to an unneutral article.

Thanks again and feel free to check out my work on the public access television article where I make numerous contributions. DavidWJohnson 18:00, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Re: De Administrando Imperio

I admit I know little about DAI except what I've read on this article and DAI's copy on wikisource. What I do know, though, is:

• that you're removing a lot of material from the aricle instead of fixing the facts that you find inappropriate.
• that you (your sockpuppet User:Matt Parlow, actually) only argued about what is false in the article, but failed to give any insight into what is true about DAI contents.
• that it's higly inappropriate and uncivil to use image:Stop hand.svg and edit summaries like "rvv" when you're in content dispute with someone.
• that your previous actions like the one on Mirko Norac didn't display a bit of good faith, so it's quite logical to assume that you don't have it on DAI either.

Duja 07:04, 9 October 2006 (UTC)