This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mapuploader8575 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

That's not right. I just join Wikipedia. I really have noting to explain. I just started.

Decline reason:

Your first edit just happens to be to a fairly obscure template page - not even an article - and employs comparatively complex wiki-syntax without error, in exactly the same way as a know sockpuppeteer? If it looks like a duck... Yunshui  13:21, 28 April 2015 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I don't think people don't want me here so I am going to step back. I don't want to be blamed for something because I'm doing the similar stuff to another user. Will step back until this is cleared. Another reason why I'm stepping back because I found this 2006 December investigation page, and I was being talked about on it, and it look like Fredddie didn't believe me. Blocked by me.............................................. So Freddie or Kinu won't do it.
You need to relax and the SPI investigation play out. If you are really not the same person as 2006 December, that will be proven by an editor with CheckUser rights. If you are, the standard offer applies. Go do something else for 6 months or so, ask an admin to review your case, and your indefinite block might be rescinded. Making new accounts every time talk page access is revoked is not going to help your case; remember, this one was spotted after one edit.
Also, I couldn't block you if I wanted to. I am not an admin. –Fredddie 11:54, 30 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
Per WP:BLANKING, you may not remove declined unblock requests from your talk page. The removal of the other content is acceptable. --Kinu t/c 15:41, 30 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

okay, thank you for the reminder Kinu.

When my IP adress is unblocked on October 1, 2015 will I be able to create an new account?

No. That is block evasion and will lead to another block. What you can and should do is re-appeal your block on this account. In the interim, it will help your case if you have helped out on another project like wikibooks or commons. Good luck. Happy Squirrel (talk) 02:19, 31 May 2015 (UTC)Reply
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mapuploader8575 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I waited almost three months, and I read Guide to appealing blocks. I understand why I was block because I edit things that where unnecessary. Another reason why I was block because I had a copyright violation that I did not know was a copyright (a Interstate Guide Image). I know now that that anything you read is a copyright. Another reason why I was block I created multiple accounts to disobeyed the blocks like this account. I won't ever do that again, and I won't be block again because I officially know the rules. For my conclusion, I would like to say that I will NOT ever do the things that iv done. I just stared Wikipedia so I needed to get to know the rules. I am asking the community to give me a second chance. If I do get unblock you can watch all my edits, and they will be reliable. I will not be a problem to this project ever again.

Decline reason:

Firstly, you should use WP:UTRS to request an unblock for your original account. Secondly, it has been exactly 38 days since your last unblock request. That's a little over one month, not "almost three", and not even close to the six months mentioned in the standard offer. Huon (talk) 00:47, 5 June 2015 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Maybe in October or in 2016 I'll make another one.


😥 SORRY!!!! If I get another chance......☺

  • Clearly it is not October or 2016, so I have no clue why you thought your appeal via UTRS would be accepted when you sent it today.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 23:06, 5 June 2015 (UTC)Reply


So when would be a good time to make another unblock request?

January 5th 2016 (in six months). Happy Squirrel (talk) 16:18, 6 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

My grammar is awful. I'm working on it. I just started college.

I've been looking through the accounts that people think that I am responsible for are not me, hear are the following accounts that are not me:

I've stopped creating new account while being block, because you will be eventually be blocked from that account. I would like to recover this account only.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mapuploader8575 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I socked again, and I am very sorry. I just want one more chance, it's been year since I started Wikipedia. I did not know the rules of wikipedia, like the copy right, the edit war, and unnecessary. It's hard for me to understand things because I have a disability called Autism, that's also why my grammar has been awful. The sockpuppets I did not know at first, but after my second account was blocked, I kept doing it, thinking I can get away with the block. If you unblock me, I promise to take Wikipedia seriously, and t never do the thing I did last year. Wikipedia means so much to me, and I want to help improve road articles, and I promise to never break the rules on Wikipedia. I hope Kinu and all of the administrator's on Wikipedia are convinced.

Decline reason:

The talk page access of your original account (2006 December) has been restored. Please, log in to your original account (2006 December), go to User talk:2006 December and make an unblock request. Only the original account can be unblocked, not the sockpuppets. And, when making unblock request, be sure to list all the accounts you have been using (ever). Vanjagenije (talk) 23:21, 25 January 2016 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.