Makofish

Welcome!

Hello, Makofish, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome.  Jim1138 (talk) 08:57, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

SMART criteria

Your addition is off topic, wp:unsourced, and wp:spam. Perhaps it belongs in another article or its own article. Jim1138 (talk) 08:57, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

The first problem is a wp:conflict of interest. An editor's purpose is to build an encyclopedia. Promoting or even writing about one's company or their products is likely to be in conflict with this and is strongly discouraged. See also: wp:What Wikipedia is not

I would suggest discussing this at the wp:teahouse. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 10:28, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Burke and Wills expedition has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Burke and Wills expedition was changed by Makofish (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.928551 on 2017-10-09T22:13:32+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:13, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to 1840s. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Adam9007 (talk) 23:16, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 1840s, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: 1840s was changed by Makofish (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.914239 on 2017-10-10T23:17:26+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:17, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Burke and Wills expedition. Kerry (talk) 04:54, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Floquenbeam (talk) 22:49, 16 October 2017 (UTC)