Nomination of Szekely moustache for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Szekely moustache is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Szekely moustache until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

 A S U K I T E   14:28, 13 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppet investigation edit

I assume you are identical with banned user Hortobagy and opened a sockpuppet investigation. Borsoka (talk) 14:56, 13 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

What you assume doesn't concern me. But I do see that you hate Szekely people. You really can't admit we are different? Magysze (talk) 16:35, 14 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
       , különbözünk. Borsoka (talk) 16:45, 14 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

February 2021 edit

  I noticed that you have posted comments to the page Talk:List of Romanian words of possible Dacian origin in a language other than English. At the English-language Wikipedia, we try to use English for all comments. Posting all comments in English makes it easier for other editors to join the conversation and help you. If you cannot avoid using another language, then please provide a translation into English, if you can. If you cannot provide a translation, please go to the list of Wikipedias, look in the list for a Wikipedia that is in your language, and edit there instead of here. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. Tgeorgescu (talk) 16:29, 13 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Indefinite block edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing pertaining to ethno-national provocations and fabrications.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 18:35, 14 February 2021 (UTC)Reply