Welcome! edit

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Cindy(talk) 08:05, 24 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

March 2014 edit

  Your addition to Fontoxml has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Cindy(talk) 08:06, 24 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Maartenvanvulpen. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Fontoxml, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

  • Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
  • Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
  • Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
  • Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Cindy(talk) 08:07, 24 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi Cindy, first of all thank you for your welcome message. Since I'm working for FontoXML, I've tried to write the item from a neutral point of view. Other XML editors are also available as (neutral) product description on Wikipedia. My objective is to place a neutral page on FontoXML as well, not to spam Wikipedia.

Links to list of research edit

We do not typically provide these. Pubmed does a good job and we list them on the talk page. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 13:21, 23 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Fontoxml edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Fontoxml requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MrOllie (talk) 15:23, 4 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

· Hi MrOllie, can you please explain the reason why the contribution related to Fonto Fontoxml, a XML editor used by over 100,000 subject matter experts, is deleted from Wikipedia? Also, the reference to Fonto on the Comparison_of_XML_editors has been removed without clear motivation. I understand that Wikipedia isn't a place for commercial and marketing-driven pages. From my point of view, adding Fonto to the comparison is a relevant addition to making the comparison more complete. Can you explain to me why products with a smaller user-base are still in the comparison and aren't deleted? Thank you for time and information. Maartenvanvulpen (talk) 09:12, 10 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Please read over the links embedded in the message I left above, they should make it clear. - MrOllie (talk) 12:30, 10 December 2019 (UTC)Reply