MR.TVCEO
July 2017
edit | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. only (talk) 20:32, 16 July 2017 (UTC) |
MR.TVCEO (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Can I please have my account unblocked? i'm not sure why it was blocked as I have not violated any of the rules. Thank you.
Accept reason:
This isn't socking; the user was told to use the account he'd already created when asking for an unblock. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 22:05, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
- Only, the supposed master was blocked solely for the username. Creating a new account with an acceptable username (and I do think this one doesn't violate the username policy) in such cases is explicitly permitted; in fact, it's recommended: "please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual", says the block message. Are there any further reasons for the block beyond them likely being User:EntertainmentAssociates? If there aren't, I'd unblock this account, and leave a comment at the other account to clarify that they don't need an unblock for that account if this is them. Huon (talk) 21:03, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
- There's also the WP:COI/WP:AUTO aspect as it's the same person as the subject of the article. However, you're welcome to handle as you see fit. I missed that it was a softblock username block; thought it was a hard block one. Just a couple of days ago I softblocked a promotional name and was told by another admin not to since it encourages socking so... mixed signals! Like I said, you're welcome to handle this in whichever way you deem appropriate. only (talk) 21:14, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
- I'd actually told him this account was OK to use: [1]. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 22:05, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for handling, Jpgordon. Just to note, though, whatever account you'd seen in 2013 isn't the same as this one since it was created just today. only (talk) 22:16, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
- I'd actually told him this account was OK to use: [1]. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 22:05, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
- There's also the WP:COI/WP:AUTO aspect as it's the same person as the subject of the article. However, you're welcome to handle as you see fit. I missed that it was a softblock username block; thought it was a hard block one. Just a couple of days ago I softblocked a promotional name and was told by another admin not to since it encourages socking so... mixed signals! Like I said, you're welcome to handle this in whichever way you deem appropriate. only (talk) 21:14, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
{unblock| So can I please be unblock? Please let me know if I need to change my usnername or exactly what is needed? in not clear on what I need to do. Thank you}}
OK, you're unblocked now. But you need to study these policies: WP:COI and WP:AUTO. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 22:07, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
Thank you!!!
Your autobiography edits
editPlease bear in mind that our articles must be expressed neutrally. The phrasing you are using at Curtis Williams is too promotional and biased toward the subject (yourself). Saying things like "Victor swore Williams’s ability to light up the room and his charming energy he was indeed a young star in the making" and "Williams would continue to shine..." are not examples of the neutral tone that is appropriate for an encyclopedia article. I'd suggest taking a look at WP:AUTO and WP:COI in addition to WP:NPOV. It's really a good idea for you to step away from the article about yourself. only (talk) 00:52, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:Curtis Williams Actor, Producer, Writer.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Train2104 (t • c) 18:28, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Actor Curtis Williams Jr.jpg
edit
A tag has been placed on File:Actor Curtis Williams Jr.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Train2104 (t • c) 18:29, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Actor Curtis Williams.jpg
edit
A tag has been placed on File:Actor Curtis Williams.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Train2104 (t • c) 18:29, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Actor Curtis Williams.jpg
edit A tag has been placed on File:Actor Curtis Williams.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hiàn (talk) 23:10, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
The file File:Curtis Williams.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Uploaded for Curtis Williams. No other use.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:41, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
