User talk:M.Caban/Edit Wikipedia Work design

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

Name of student reviewer	Wikipedia User:Joselv83
Date of review	5/9/2013
Name of editor	Wikipedia User: M.Caban
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:M.Caban
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	05/9/13
Date review submitted to instructor	05/9/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)	Good length
Image (needed/appropriate)	N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	Accurate to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting	Good Formatting.
Grammar & composition	I think you may need to add the 's after "consist" where you wrote: "Herzberg theory consist..." Other than that, everything is good!
Other comments	Good Job!

Joselv83 (talk) 03:58, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

Name of student reviewer	Wikipedia User:CRamel16
Date of review	05/06/2013
Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page**	Wikipedia User:M.Caban
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:M.Caban/Edit_Wikipedia_Work_design
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	05/07/13
Date review submitted to instructor	05/07/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)	Perfect length
Image (needed/appropriate)	no image
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	The information is relevant.
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	yes
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	yes
Wikiformatting	used bullet points.
Grammar & composition	Good Work
Other comments	use external links for extra credits CRamel16 (talk) 23:39, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Name of student reviewer	Wikipedia User:Nikicia
Date of review	May 7, 2013
Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page**	Wikipedia User:M.Caban
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:M.Caban/Edit_Wikipedia_Work_design
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	May 7, 2013
Date review submitted to instructor	May 7, 2013
Length of edit (too long/too short)	Length is appropriate
Image (needed/appropriate)	Not needed
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	Accurate information
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	yes
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	Article is accurate and relevant to I/O Psychology
Wikiformatting	bullets used
Grammar & composition	Good
Other comments	Nikicia (talk) 08:14, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Name of student reviewer **Replace with username for version on talk page**	Wikipedia User:Xyzbb1253
Date of review	5/7/13
Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page**	Wikipedia User:M.Caban
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:M.Caban/Edit_Wikipedia_Work_design
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	5/7/13
Date review submitted to instructor	5/7/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)	Meets the requirement
Image (needed/appropriate)	N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	Information was sourced from the textbook
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	Information is related to I/O Psychology
Wikiformatting	Neutral point of view, bullets and number are aligned
Grammar & composition	Grammar is good, numbering and bullets are fine
Other comments	None
Reviewer's Signature	Xyzbb1253 (talk) 09:00, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Name of student reviewer Trinirebel
Date of review	5/7/13
Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page**	Wikipedia User:M.Caban
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:M.Caban/Edit_Wikipedia_Work_design
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	5/7/13
Date review submitted to instructor	5/7/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)	Appropriate length
Image (needed/appropriate)	None applicable for this edit
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	Information was sourced from the textbook
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	Information is related to I/O Psychology
Wikiformatting	bullets and number are aligned, exemplary formatting
Grammar & composition	Error free
Other comments	Note worthy edit!
Reviewer's Signature	Trinirebel (talk) 03:11, 8 May 2013 (UTC)