Lvsubram

Copyright issue with Indian National Academy of Enginering

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Indian National Academy of Enginering, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.inae.org/. As a copyright violation, Indian National Academy of Enginering appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Indian National Academy of Enginering has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Indian National Academy of Enginering. If the article or image has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Indian National Academy of Enginering, after describing the release on the talk page. However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Whpq 22:28, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Noisy text

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Noisy text, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 17:16, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by some search engines, including Google. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 04:34, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Always attribute text when borrowing from Wiki articles

For example, your should have attributed [[1] in your edits to [2]. Keep editing, but don't be careless when citing other peoples' work.--Lucas559 (talk) 20:09, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

December 2018

Hello, I'm Abelmoschus Esculentus. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ambidexterity, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus ^{talk / contribs} 10:14, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Infovision

The article Infovision has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

advert with no third-party sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 20 September 2022 (UTC)