It is very clear that you are a sockpuppet of some other user, created for the purpose of disrupting Wikipedia. I ask you to desist and behave yourself. Cheers, smoddy 20:31, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Look, you arrive on Wikipedia, then go straight to a long-running dispute and start moving stuff around, using edit summaries and talk pages, generally behaving like an experienced Wikipedian. In short, you are another user who has come to Wikipedia under a different name to disrupt proceedings. Don't take us for fools. We aren't. If you want to know more, please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet. smoddy 20:40, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Then who are you? I am perfectly willing to concede the point if you explain yourself. smoddy 20:46, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Maybe she's just an active person. ‡ Jarlaxle 00:02, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
- It's User:Eyeon, User:Fecologist, and User:Niglet. SlimVirgin (talk) 00:16, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
feces edit
You probably failed to notice that I very seriously argued for the inclusion of human feces in the article. But I also respect opinions and tastes of other people. The feces are recognizable, only less shocking, I believe. Please don't look at this issue as an exercise in free speech. The primary goal of wikipedia is information. It is all here. And by the way, I am against this silly idea of "shocking image" warning instead of the image itself, but I don't object. mikka (t) 20:44, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Absolutely do not move my vote comment at talk:feces!! User:Eyeon got in enough trouble for similar shenanigans during the last vote. You can go ahead and quote my comment and then respond to it, but do not move them. BlankVerse ∅ 28 June 2005 05:02 (UTC)
Vandalism edit
If you delete comments from a talk page again, or do anything similar to an article, I will block you for vandalism. SlimVirgin (talk) 00:16, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Archiving edit
Oh, okay. Well, you should cut the oldest discussions from the page and paste them to a new page, such as Talk:Feces/Archive 1. ‡ Jarlaxle 00:18, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
However, all of the discussions on the talk page are current discussions, so they shouldn't be archived yet. ‡ Jarlaxle 00:21, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
Mikkalai's behavior edit
Although I disagree with yours and Gemini6Ice's positions on the Feces article, I am horrified by the arrogance of the admins who are using blocking to stifle debate, clearly in violation of policy. Since Mikkalai has today made his contempt official, I have started an RFC on his blocking of you. Can one or both of you please sign your name under 'users certifying the basis for this dispute?' If not, the RFC will be deleted. [1] Floopy 7 July 2005 02:00 (UTC)