LRP19PT

May 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Luis Díaz (Colombian footballer), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:50, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 13:46, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

@Bbb23

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LRP19PT (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please unblock me, i just explained my edit on Luis Díaz, don't block me like that! I apologize, but unblock me i was block indefinitely on french wikipedia, don't do that here! I need editing... The image was blurry so i changed to a better quality image and you block me just for that, that was not a disruptive editing, like i said, the image was blurry, so i thought that i could change! Please unblock me, i need it LRP19PT (talk) 13:52, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I'm not sure what the source of your need to edit is, as no one "needs" to be here. If you need to be here, you must abide by guidelines and consensus. 331dot (talk) 14:39, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@331dot

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LRP19PT (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I've explained my reason, and i'm sure you didn't understood but whatever, i like editing it's unfair being blocked like that, i did nothing bad today for being blocked, so give another chance please!

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 16:51, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LRP19PT (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I had 3 hours, and i think your right, i've understood your point, i finally understand, i will not cause damage or disruption for Wikipedia, and i will make useful contributions instead, so for me the block is not necessary anymore, i'm sorry for all! Unblock me please!

Decline reason:

We have now found evidence that you have engaged in sockpuppetry. You need to discuss that and disclose any accounts you may have created whether you used them or not. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:07, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

LRP19PT (talk) 17:01, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/LRP19PT. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- RoySmith (talk) 01:44, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

I'm quiting Wikipedia

@RoySmith Delete my 2 suckpuppet pages, it's not worth it, i'm quiting Wikipedia, i'm tired! LRP19PT (talk) 07:50, 7 May 2022 (UTC)