Kjbman

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from International Bible College. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:16, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to International Bible College, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:19, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on International Bible College. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
2. Editors violating the rule will usually be blocked for 24 hours for a first incident.
3. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording, and content that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Eeekster (talk) 01:26, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Kent Hovind appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:10, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Kent Hovind

Please see the talk page on this article; your edits are factually incorrect and serve to add inappropriate bias to the article. In addition, they've been repeatedly discussed, and a consensus is already in place. If you have new sources showing that Hovind's science claims are not contradictions of established science (i.e., confirmation of those claims in peer-reviewed science journals), come discuss them on the article's talk page. I don't think those claims have been confirmed yet, though, because I think I would have read about discoveries that redefine modern science like that in the papers. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:20, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

I am going to reiterate FisherQueen's request, and advise you to discuss your edits on the Kent Hovind article talk page if you should continue to believe them justified. Edit warring is not acceptable, and what you are doing is textbook edit warring—continuing to make disputed edits rather than discussing them. Continued edit warring will lead to a block from editing. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 02:12, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Firm warning

So far, almost all of your edits to Wikipedia have violated Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. In addition to that, you've repeatedly broken the rule against edit-warring. I strongly advise that you learn more about how Wikipedia works before continuing. If you understand how to write in a neutral, factual way, and can make the encyclopedia better, then you are welcome at Wikipedia. However, if all of your edits make the encyclopedia worse, then we will have to block you from editing further. I hope you are able to read, understand, and follow Wikipedia's rules, because we can always use more volunteers to make the encyclopedia better. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 01:08, 23 February 2011 (UTC)