Kissmykumbaya

Gaspard van der Heyden

Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for the much needed contribution on Gaspard van der Heyden. If you get a chance to to find more exact references to the sources you mention please add them. Web resources would be particularly welcome. Peter Mercator (talk)

Thanks for the welcome, I cribbed most of the references I used straight from you're fantastic work on the Mercator page. Most of the books that differ have the relevant pages available on Google books, I'll try to add more links on the next round of edits to the page. I think it still needs some work, so I'd value any tips and ideas you have. I'm a van der Heyden, so serendipity seems to demand a collaborative effort between us. ;-) Kissmykumbaya (talk) 05:17, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Carry on the good work. You can take anything of mind that you can find. Just guard against over duplication for then zealous editors will come along and criticise. Thus one article may discuss the rudiments of a topic and another may have full details but both shouldn't have full details. There is a very rough user page which may provide some more links for you. It includes stuff which may eventually go into the Mercator biography.

Some minor comments on your on the lead and first para only. 1) I tend not to put references in the lead if the points are covered further down the article. 2) Your referencing method is fine for a short article but for longer articles I prefer to separate notes/references from an alphabetical bibliography. It's more complicated but I prefer it instead of having a list of works in place order only. 3) Use of block capitals in references is really ugly. 4) Your first section needs more references unless you are suggesting that it's all in De Smet (in which case the ref should be moved up and, if necessary repeated). Where are the biographical details from? Recorded where? Where is the letter of Gogienus found? Was Danticus really a policeman? 5) I tend not to use elisions like he's. 6) Plausible is a difficult word in a wiki. Plausible to whom?

Don't think I'm carping overmuch. All will be improved in due course. May I suggest that you get in touch through email (via my user page and after placing your one of your own emails in preferences ). It would be good to know your background. Peter Mercator (talk) 16:42, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello, Kissmykumbaya, and Welcome to Wikipedia!   

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

---

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

• Table of contents / Department directory

• The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
• The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

• Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
• Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
• Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

• Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
• The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
• Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

• Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

• Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

• Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
• If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Kissmykumbaya, good luck, and have fun. — Newslinger talk 08:07, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Kissmykumbaya, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! — Newslinger talk 08:07, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)