Kilian76

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wild Roses (TV series), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Wild Roses (TV series) was changed by Kilian76 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2009-02-20T04:45:51+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 04:45, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

I put merge tags on the two articles. After 5 days you simply merge info from one article into the other and tag the one not being kept for deletion. I tagged these so that the Wild Roses one should be kept as it's a better article. — Rlevse • Talk • 10:55, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

The issue here is that the title Wild Roses has other meanings, such that the Canadian television series does not qualify as the primary usage of the title; accordingly, the television series' article must be at Wild Roses (TV series), and the plain title Wild Roses must be a disambiguation page. Appropriate content may be added to the title Wild Roses (TV series), but the choice of mergefrom and mergeto targets is based exclusively on title considerations, not assessments of article quality. And even on article quality, while the plain-titled article was more thorough, it wasn't a particularly high-quality article, just a longer one that still needed a bunch of cleanup. Bearcat (talk) 05:33, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Wildroses opening thumbnail.png

Thanks for uploading File:Wildroses opening thumbnail.png. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:01, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Wildroses opening.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Wildroses opening.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:16, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:WildRosesLogo.png

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:WildRosesLogo.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Closedmouth (talk) 08:09, 15 September 2009 (UTC)