KezianAvenger
Full Armor of God Broadcast edit
- Comment The Full Armor of God Broadcast is facing deletion. Any advice, assistance or help would be much appreciated! Help represent NON-SELLOUT Christian Metal!! Help The Full Armor of God Broadcast keep giving the devil a blackeye on Wikipedia! Ivanhoe610fa (talk) 03:54, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
August 2009 edit
The edits you have made to the discography of Winds of Plague have all been reverted - do not change genres on music based articles, usually such edits are indentified as vandalism the only way to have a valid say in all of it is to discuss it on the talk page. • GunMetal Angel 22:55, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gangrene_(album)
- Nothing has ever stated that the band has black metal elements, but symphonic black metal and their first two albums do contain symphonic black metal elements so this genre will be placed back onto their first two albums, you only had a single-comment discussion with an IP adress which will not work, and furthermore you don't even have a source for it. And for the next part your grammar is terrible in such cases of writing genres, I mean seriously why do you always captalize the first letter? The only reason why the first letter is ocassionally shown captalized is because it is written as the begining of something. - GunMetal Angel 20:39, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- Alright, but these are the original genres, stated on WoP's two albums, not stated by me, might I also add that A7X's self-titled album was never contained "country elements", just the song "Dear God" was stated that it contained country rock traces in the blend of hard rock, if anything several reviewers have said that the whole album is under the hard rock genre. - GunMetal Angel 22:22, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- See WP:COLOR for color assortments, ect. and you'll have to edit your prefences and piece codes together under prefences it will say "Signature". Imput it there. Furthermore the last bit I would like to say about WoP is that they do have black metal elements, check out this month's Revolver (with The Black Dahlia Murder on the cover) one of the first statements written about the band is being a "deathcore band with black metal keyboards and pianos". • GunMetal Angel 22:55, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Please don't do that - it's vandalism. ~ mazca talk 17:18, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Slipknot Project Roll Call edit
In an attempt to breath life back in to the Project I am arranging a Roll Call and will begin making arrangement for group initiatives throughout the coming months. Just so the Project can keep an updated list of people who continue to contribute to the Project a Roll Call will happen from time to time. It is understood that over time, users may have lost interest in the Project or Wikipedia all together; if you have, it's no big deal. If you would like to keep contributing to the project please sign the list here. If you do not add your name to the list by January 16, you will become an "Inactive member", this will bar you from voting in the AoF, as well as receiving the monthly newsletter. Remember, if you ever want to join the project again, you are always welcome!!! REZTER TALK ø 01:34, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
January 2010 Slipknot Newsletter edit
The Slipknot WikiProject Newsletter Issue VI - January 16, 2010 If you would like to help out with future newsletters, please contact the Outreach Department. | |
|
Apologies to the editors for the lack of project activity in the past couple of months. But let's forget about that and move forward, we've had great success as a project so far and continue to improve articles. I would like to take this opportunity to remind editors that the main premise of this WikiProject is to bring editors together and collaborate on improving articles related to Slipknot. Editors are encouraged to address objectives mentioned on the project to-do list and arrange collaborations with other project members on the project talk page. If you want to work on an article but want help from other editors, ask for it here.
Slipknot recently concluded touring in support of their 2008 album All Hope Is Gone and released a short-film alongside the single "Snuff". Band members have begun working with their side-projects again, including Stone Sour and Dirty Little Rabbits, albums are expected from both of those bands in 2010. |
| Hello KezianAvenger, you have received this notice because you have placed your name on the list of members of WikiProject Metal. We are currently looking to make the wikiproject more active, and in doing so, we need to have a list of active members on the wikiproject. If you wish to stay an active part of wikiproject metal, please add your username to Wikipedia:WikiProject Metal/Active Users. Conversely, if you wish to leave the wikiproject, please remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiProject Metal/Members. Thank you. | 
|
Just to let you know edit
Users are allowed to remove warnings as it indicates they have read them. Users cannot remove unblock templates after they have been declined and I believe they cannot remove sockpuppet notices (you may want to check me out on that one). You can read more at Wikipedia:User page. Regards Tiderolls 00:21, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
Slipknot Project - AoF voting now open edit
Voting for the next Article of Focus from the Slipknot Porject is now open. You are invited to vote on which article you think the project should focus it's efforts on based on nominations from project members. Go to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Slipknot/AoF to vote and find out more! REZTER TALK ø 15:26, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Reviewer granted edit
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.
If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:47, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
You have new messages edit
- Waiting for you on my talk page :-) Wifione ....... Leave a message 13:19, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
January 2011 edit
- I would like to know how fixing gramatical errors in an article is unconstructive. I thought my edits were justified and looking at the article without them I notice that it no longer looks like a wikipedia article at all. There are places that needed capital letters where I placed them and my only other edit their was removing ACTUAL vandalism. Could you explain to me why you felt I needed a warning? KezianAvenger™ 03:12, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
- They weren't unconstructive, and I apologize both for my reverting your edits and for the warning (which I'd be happy to remove if you wish). I looked back at the history and, as near as I can tell, your edits were caught up with an IP's edits and I probably didn't slow down enough to sort it out. Again, my apologies. :) Wikipelli Talk 23:28, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
- It's fine, I was just kinda confused about a vandalism warning for capitalization. The article's been reverted to what it was a few months ago now so it has actual encyclopedic info. Probably something I should've done originally considering that type of thing is why I requested rollback rights, but at least it was done. Anyways, thanks for clearing that up and I wouldn't mind having the warning removed. KezianAvenger™ 23:51, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
A Wikiproject you are part of is up for deletion edit
The deletion discussion for Wikipedia:WikiProject Linkin Park is found at Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Linkin_Park Dream Focus 09:49, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
Ichthus: January 2012 edit
 |
ICHTHUS |
| January 2012 |
In this issue...
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here
Roll Call August 2014 edit
With the fifth album just weeks away and loads of information is being released concerning the album, singles, tours etc. I would like as many people as possible to join in to help get some more of Slipknot's articles in the Good Article section and even help push the main page as a featured article. Just so the Project can keep an updated list of people who continue to contribute to the Project a Roll Call will happen from time to time. It is understood that over time, users may have lost interest in the Project or Wikipedia all together; if you have, it's no big deal. If you would like to keep contributing to the project please sign the list. If you do not add your name to the list by September 25, you will become an "Inactive member", this will bar you from voting in the AoF. Remember, if you ever want to join the project again, you are always welcome!!! If you are interested in continuing helping sign your name here Kevon100 Talk! Mail 20:23, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit
Hello, KezianAvenger. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit
Hello, KezianAvenger. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)