Kenmcalister
MV reply 2
edit
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Managing a conflict of interest
edit
Hello, Kenmcalister. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
- Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
- Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
- Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 16:05, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- Please see our policy against edit warring. If you continue to do this you will be blocked from editing.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 16:13, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Welcome
edit
|
Blocked for sockpuppetry
editYou have been blocked 72 hours for sockpuppetry to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 14:19, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Kenmcalister (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I must have tried to edit with out being logged in this am and it thought I was a spammer Kenmcalister (talk) 15:09, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I'm willing to accept that you may have accidentally edited while logged out. However, even if that last revert was made with your account, you would still be eligible to be blocked due to the ongoing edit warring on both List of bullpup firearms and Bushmaster M17S. If you will agree to discuss your changes on the respective talk pages of these articles, rather than bullishly re-inserting your edits, then we may be able to proceed from here. Unless there is a demonstration on your part of willingness to work within Wikipedia's processes, however, you will not be unblocked. Yunshui 雲水 15:53, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- I didn't think you were a spammer. You have been previously warned about your edits (you blanked this polite message and I cautioned you against edit warring in the above section) but you continued to edit war, this time using this IP to sock.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Berean Hunter (talk • contribs) 11:30, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Then I suggest you block the other also for doing the same to me as he removed my edits first and he started the conflict. All I ask is that he does not remove my valid edits that I have made to correct the listing, that can be verified from the manufactures web side.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kenmcalister (talk • contribs) 11:36, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
- If several other editors are reverting your edits, that suggests you need to work out a content dispute on the article's talk page rather than edit warring as you've been doing. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:52, 17 June 2015 (UTC)