Katyhuff
|
SwisterTwister talk 06:36, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Katyhuffback.png
edit
Thanks for uploading File:Katyhuffback.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:50, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Katyhuffback.png
edit
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Katyhuffback.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:29, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
Rationale for File:Katyhuffback.png
editThanks for noticing. So, this picture was taken of me by a friend for a photography class. It was very casual, and I never signed a model release, so it may actually be the case that I own the photo. Not being particularly well versed in the details of copyright law, it's not clear to me what is the case, but it seems absurd that a picture of me, that she sent to me without caveat, and that she won't be using for any commercial purposes (because she doesn't have my model release to do so) should have a problem with fair use. Please describe in more clear english, rather than wikipedia jargon, what you want me to do in this case. Is it sufficient, for example, for me to forward the email in which she requests to take my photo for her photography class? Does she need to send a separate email? Do I need to add some metadata to the photo? And, if so, exactly which metadata would you recommend? After reading through the Non-free rationale tag information you linked to, I still don't know what it is you're asking me to do specifically.
(P.S. I failed to log in before posting the above message. All of that was from me, Katyhuff .)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Paul Wilson (nuclear engineer) has been accepted
edit
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 06:35, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
The file File:Katyhuff.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused personal photo. Out of scope.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:02, 15 June 2022 (UTC)