Katrin Teubner

Welcome!

Hello, Katrin Teubner, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was International Association for Danube Research, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:26, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Internationale Arbeitsgemeinschaft Donauforschung

The article Internationale Arbeitsgemeinschaft Donauforschung has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Please create this at de.wikipedia.org and let this copy be deleted; an English version already exists at International Association for Danube Research. When reusing content from International Association for Danube Research, please make sure to attribute it properly, via https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=International_Association_for_Danube_Research&action=history -- see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:29, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

This is the English Wikipedia

Hi, you're on en.wikipedia.org. Could you please create German articles at de.wikipedia.org instead? Thanks! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:52, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi ToBeFree oder sollte ich besser sagen "Um Frei zu Sein", denn jeder kann sich ja mal ein englisch aussehendes Mäntelchen umhängen - just to repeat what I have please mentioned before: Die Internationale Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Donausforschung gibt es nicht (noch mal: sie existiert nicht) - dieser Verein heißt seit Jahrzehnten "International Association of Danube Research" - jetzt hätte ich gern von TOBeFree eine konstruktive Antwort, wie man eine engl Seite löschen können will und zugleich eine dt Seite fordern kann zu schreiben, wo doch diese Schreiberei so dann schon gar nicht mehr relevant ist. Ich hoffe dass bei anderen Themen die von der Wiki-Community empfohlenen Editoren in ihrer Meinungsäußerung mehr fundiert sind - einfach die IAD-Int Assoc Danube Res zu löschen (was man hier verschieben nennt) finde ich gewöhnungsbedüftig und ich verstehe hier immer noch nicht ganz dass eine seriös ausgearbeitete Wikipedia-Seite mit einem Handschlag einfach der Allgemeinheit entzogen wurde. Es gleicht mir fast einer Bestrafung. Vielleicht hätte es ja doch jemand unter den Wiki-Lesern interessiert, was die "Int Assoc Danube Res" wohl ist. Die jetzige Fassung der engl und dt Seite entspricht absolut nicht dem aktuellen Stand (wo auch immer sie auftaucht in den WikiNachfolgeSeiten) und verweist auch nicht auf die vielen Links mit Referenzen wie sie Dez 2018 ausgearbeitet war. Warum kann jemand ohne erkennbaren fachlichen Background (soweit ich gesehen habe war der/die maßgebliche Editor/in mit dem Aha-Erlebnis, er/sie habe was erkannt, habe anhand der ausgeschriebenen Namens die Nähe zum Verein entdeckt), jemand der anscheinend fern von allem wissenschaftlichen Arbeiten (zB in dem Umweltbereich) geschweige denn sich in irgendeiner seriösen Publikationstätigkeit gute Erfahrung außerhalb von Wikipedia aneignen konnte, so durchdringend und grundlegend da schalten und walten. Wonach werden die Wiki-Editoren ausgewählt – und wie qualifizieren sich die Wiki-Editoren für „ihre“ spezifischen Themenbereiche? Üblicherweise sagt schon der Hausverstand, dass man sich nur zu Themen äußert, wo man sich auskennt und auch dann beitragen kann. Wie ist dies in Wikipedia gelöst? Diese letzte Frage war bitte eine ernsthafte Frage und mir auch grundlegende Frage. Ich versteh es eben einfach nicht. Woanders muss man sich als Reviewer in Zeitschriften qualifizieren!

Proposed deletion of Die Internationale Arbeitsgemeinschaft Donauforschung

The article Die Internationale Arbeitsgemeinschaft Donauforschung has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

PLEASE do this at de.wikipedia.org instead. This is the English Wikipedia. An English article already exists at International Association for Danube Research. There is no hope for this article to be kept; please don't disruptively create more of them and please let the valid PROD tag stay.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:53, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Internationale Arbeitsgemeinschaft Donauforschung for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Internationale Arbeitsgemeinschaft Donauforschung is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internationale Arbeitsgemeinschaft Donauforschung until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:55, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is International Association for Danube Research. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:38, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Regarding Talk:Die Internationale Arbeitsgemeinschaft Donauforschung

Hi Katrin Teubner,

as described on the page itself, you seem to be the current general secretary of the organization. Please stop your promotional edits. And no, German articles do not belong to en.wikipedia.org. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:07, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

You are free to create articles written in German at the German Wikipedia. However you are still obligated to follow the German Wikipedia's guideline on conflict of interest (de:Wikipedia:Interessenkonflikt) and the policy on paid editing disclosure (meta:TOU/de#paid-contrib-disclosure). --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 18:43, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

International Association for Danube Research moved to draftspace

Hi, please see WBG's message at the bottom of User talk:Thomashein2709. Thanks! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:32, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

New message at User talk:ToBeFree

Hello, Katrin Teubner. You have new messages at ToBeFree's talk page.
Message added 20:24, 21 February 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:24, 21 February 2019 (UTC)