User talk:KatnissEverdeen/Archive 2016

Re: List of Girl Meets World episodes

Nice catch! :) Amaury (talk) 15:04, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Amaury Thanks! :) Katniss 22:26, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Oh, thanks for pointing out, I even noticed that in the description but then I forgot and only focused on the actual video. nyuszika7h (talk) 14:04, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Nyuszika7H You're welcome :) Katniss 13:18, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Be cool Scooby Doo

Unconstructive, vandalism huh? well if you look here, https://www.foxtel.com.au/got/whats-on/tv-guide/search?q=be%20cool%20scooby you'll see episodes 24-26 with titles. Alicia2801 (talk) 13:38, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi Alicia2801, I do apologize for mistakenly calling your correct edit "vandalism," but in the future I would suggest including a source so people know you aren't making up the titles, or at least include an edit summary saying where you got the info from. If you look back in the edit history, you'll see that there was quite a bit of vandalism yesterday, with people adding fake titles and descriptions. Your edit occurred around the same time as the edit that added fake titles, so it appeared that you were the same person adding more fake titles because there was no source included (even though you weren't the same person). My apologies again for the mishap, I've gone ahead and added all the episodes back into the chart and removed the warning from your talk page. Katniss 20:20, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Scooby-Doo

I appreciate everything you've done on pages involving Scooby-Do and again, I'm sorry I undid that IP user's edit on Scooby-Doo! and the Reluctant Werewolf. Dealing with IP users has started to become very stressful for me this year. Because of two bad IP hoppers who messed with Adventures of the Little Koala, The Lion Guard, and Jakers! The Adventures of Piggley Winks, I couldn't even watch those pages anymore nor watch those shows. My only deep regret is I should've put my foot down on those Hoppers' fake Wikipedia rules. — FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 01:10, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi FilmandTVFan28, thanks and no need to apologize. I didn't think that you made the edit in bad faith, I just wanted to let you know so that you weren't confused about why I reverted you. Just a simple mistake, almost everyone makes them at some point so no need to stress over it. Really sorry to hear you're having trouble on Wikipedia. I've dealt with my share of IP hoppers on here as well, so just a word of advice, try to just enjoy yourself and don't let the vandals ruin it for you. People who just come on here to vandalize and destroy content aren't worth getting stressed over. I also find it helps to take a short Wikibreak to de-stress yourself so the stress doesn't make you do something you regret later. I've never really gotten stressed with Wikipedia, except once (you're welcome to look at the section of my talk page with the crossed-out text if you want more context to what incident I'm talking about) where I did take a week-long Wikibreak and I found it really helped. Of course I don't know your full situation either, so I don't want to presume, just thought I'd give you some helpful advice from my experience. :) Cheers Katniss 02:33, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
Well, I did a break from Wikipedia for one day and it certainly helped. Thanks for listening and for the recommendation. − FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 03:43, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
FilmandTVFan28 You're very welcome! Hope it helps you feel less stressed on Wikipedia in the future and enjoy editing more again :) Katniss 16:18, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Report at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism on vandalism at List of Scooby-Doo, Where Are You! episodes

Thanks for clarifying it. You say that this particular vandalism has been going on since March, but I see there was other vandalism of a more or less similar nature before then too, and semi-protection of the article for a short time didn't stop it, so I have semi-protected it again, this time for 6 months. I'll also have a quick look at other editing from the same IP addresses to see if there's a case for blocking any of them. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:53, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for semi-protecting the article. I know one of the vandals, 71.92.79.250 (who I presume is the same person that is doing it now), was blocked back in January for the vandalism and is still currently blocked now. Thanks again Katniss 15:24, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

My thanks

I want to thank again for taking the time to listen and for the recommendation. It still hurts that I can't watch Little Koala, Lion Guard, and Piggley Winks after my bad experience with their Wikipedia pages. — FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 06:36, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, KatnissEverdeen. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you!

  For you. LordOfTheNight23 (talk) 16:50, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
LordOfTheNight23 Thank you so much! Katniss 17:57, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

 

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

  1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
  2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
  3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
  4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
  5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, SteviethemanDelivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Just saw your name while on Vandal patrol

Just couldn't resist! May the odds be always in your favor ! KoshVorlon 21:39, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

KoshVorlon Thanks! Lol Katniss 21:46, 28 December 2016 (UTC)