Kasif the great

March 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Battle of Mu'tah has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Battle of Mu'tah was changed by Kasif the great (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.887602 on 2016-03-06T18:11:50+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:11, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Warning

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Mu'tah. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Kansas Bear (talk) 15:57, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Kansas Bear (talk) 21:41, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Reported

Here. --Kansas Bear (talk) 17:59, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

August 2016

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Seleucid army, did not appear constructive and have been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Anẓar (talk) 23:18, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Kansas Bear (talk) 01:24, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Reported for edit warring

See here. --Kansas Bear (talk) 04:00, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Kasif the great, you are risking a block. There may still be time for you to comment at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Kasif the great reported by User:Kansas Bear (Result: ). Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 04:35, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Edit warring at Seleucid army

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Per the report at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Kasif the great reported by User:Kansas Bear (Result: Blocked). You are expected to get consensus for controversial changes. This means consulting others and trying to persuade them. Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 19:03, 24 August 2016 (UTC)