Kao no Nai Tsuki

Prince Shotoku

First, when it is still disputed, please do not remove "dubious."

Second, I add dubious not to the existence of the source but the reliableness of the source.

Third, tell me the reason why you removed the English-translated title of the source, "Experiences in Painting"? I took the name from here[1]. There is no reason to remove it.

Fourth, why is V of vassal in capital?

Fifth, why did you changed "Goryeo" into "Korea"? At the time the source was written, Korea was Goryeo and the source says Goryeo. Using the word Goryeo makes sence.

That they ignored Japan's humble national power is dubious. Who says "humble"? It is evaluation by a wikipedian. Since there is no source which shows that they ignored Japan's humble national power, it is dubious. Besides, Balhae paid tribute to Japan according to this website. At least, Japan regarded Balhae as tributary. I don't know what Balhae was thinking, though. According to Nihonshoki, Silla and Baekje paid tribute to Japan. I don't know the truth, though.

Please do not remove "dubious" at least until the discussion is over.--Michael Friedrich (talk) 17:13, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

>>so it is a content dispute. It is still "unconsensed". I revert it original version before your edit.

It does not make sense. It's not me who started the edit war. The war started because of this edit. If you think you have to revert the article to the version befor the edit war, it should be this one. Let's do it.--Michael Friedrich (talk) 20:42, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Do not edit my page.

Kao no Nai Tsuki, What is

?

Don't edit my page.--Bukubku (talk) 03:08, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

3RR warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Empress Myeongseong. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.

Some user noticed me like that, you too. Be careful,too.

why was my name on that checkuser request?

I have never encountered you before, yet you added my name to a checkuser request? what the fuck was that for?

the fact that you know me and my edits, but I have never heard of you till today, makes it pretty fucking clear which account deserves checkuser (ie. not mine)

Sennen goroshi (talk) 03:58, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Lai Daihan

Don't remove correctly cited information. Don't follow me.

Sennen goroshi (talk) 02:24, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

== Request for move of Empress Myeongseong

==

Hello, Kao no Nai Tsuki. Sennen goroshi (talk · contribs) has requested for move to the article of Empress Myeongseong to Queen Min. Since you've participated in editing and discussing the article, your input would be appreciated on this. Thanks.--Caspian blue 18:02, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

May 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Lai Daihan. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 17:50, 14 May 2009 (UTC)