April 2023

edit

  Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to People's Anti-Fascist Front. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Let's discuss what you want to add over here, instead of edit warring. Solblaze (talk) 15:48, 26 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

No commentary or personal views have been added to People's Anti-Fascist Front. Every single sentence is directly reflected in the citations presented. Please read and conform the citations before commenting and removing the whole content added. This article is clearly lacking a lot of information which is already present in the press, articles published by various Think Tanks and related institutions. You can certainly edit to improve the article's 'tone' to be more formal but removing whole additions without reading the source is also edit warring. Kaamavats (talk) 16:54, 26 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 08:18, 27 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Introduction to contentious topics

edit

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Kautilya3 (talk) 08:18, 27 April 2023 (UTC)Reply