|This is KSFT's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to KSFT.|
Response to your messageEdit
Thanks for the response and there is no conflict of interest.
Mamamoo fans want the blackface incident section removed for certain reasons.
1. It is unfair they have the controversial incident when other kpop groups have done mistakes pertaining to blackface or racial slurs. Mamamoo is the only kpop group who has this sort of negativity on their page.
2. We want the same treatment
Also, why does the incident included on their page? the page is semi-protected. We mean no harm.
NPR Newsletter No.15 16 November 2018Edit
ArbCom 2018 election voter messageEdit
Conflict of InterestEdit
Thanks for your help and I will definitely follow the guidelines to first Disclose the required info and refrain from editing myself and request an edit instead.
I edited today the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geologic_modelling article to include Datamine Software, the company I actually work for, which is probably something I shouldn't have done. Probably the best would be "I work here, and it is not listed, should have been, please add to the list if you agree with me" and request the edit.
This said, it is a bit weird that there is a list of Software companies there, including competitors, and it really doesn't seem like it is that unbiased. Another thing is that several other companies have articles published and I find it unlikely that unbiased third party individuals are responsible for the articles. The company I work for is renowned for its geological modelling capabilities and it is a bit surprising that it would be left out on a list that also has its main competitors.
I was actually drafting something, definitely not for the purpose of advertisement, but for the purpose of providing information, trying to just relay information similarly to what we can find in some other pages. I think this industry is big enough to have people seeking info and they would like to find it in Wikipedia, but not big enough to have people writing articles on mining software companies.
and what I am doing here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Henrique.buchhorn/sandbox/Datamine_Software
I am definitely avoiding the use of expressions like "sophisticated" or "simplifying and accelerating routine tasks" like the Maptek article and adding external references as much as I can, not only from the company website.
Anyway, my question is, will this article be refused right out of the bat because I work for the company or if the conflict of interest is stated but the article is found to be impartial and purely informative, it can still be published?
Because I am a big supporter of Wikipedia and I will not willingly do anything that goes against any of the guidelines.
Your assistance will be much appreciated.
- @Henrique.buchhorn: It looks like you've appropriately disclosed your conflict of interest on your userpage. Your draft shouldn't be declined only because of your conflict of interest, but it can be very difficult to write neutrally about your own company. Both of the articles you linked to look promotional, so you're right not to base yours on them. KSFT (t|c) 02:33, 30 November 2018 (UTC)